Women's Agripreneurship in India's Maharashtra State: An Analysis of the AC and ABC Scheme

Introduction

India is one of the world’s leading producers of agricultural commodities, and agriculture plays a critical role in providing livelihood for millions of people in the country ¹. Agriculture contributes to about 17% of India’s GDP and provides employment to over 40% of the country’s workforce ². Women’s participation in agriculture is crucial for improving agricultural productivity, ensuring food security, and promoting rural development ³. Research has shown that women’s empowerment in agriculture is associated with increased agricultural production, improved nutrition, and better household well-being ^4–6. Recognizing the importance of women in agriculture, the Indian government has been implementing various initiatives to promote agricultural development and increase women’s participation in the sector.

In recent years, the Indian government has introduced several schemes and policies to promote women agripreneurship (WA), such as the Mahila Kisan Sashaktikaran Pariyojana (MKSP), which aims to empower women farmers by providing them with access to resources, knowledge, and services ^7,8. The Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centers (AC&ABC) scheme is another such initiative, focusing on fostering Agripreneurship among young graduates and supporting them in establishing Agri Clinics and Agri Business centers ⁹.

The AC&ABC scheme has been successful in promoting agripreneurship, but studies indicate that women’s participation in the program remains low ¹⁰. Barriers such as gender norms, limited access to resources, and a lack of confidence in entrepreneurial abilities may be contributing to this disparity ¹⁰. Identifying and addressing these barriers is critical to ensuring that women can fully participate in and benefit from the AC&ABC scheme and other similar initiatives.

There is a growing body of research on women entrepreneurship ^11–16 and participation of women in agriculture and Agripreneurship in India ^17–22. However, there is still limited understanding of the status of WA and the factors influencing women’s involvement in the AC&ABC scheme and the potential benefits of their increased participation in this initiative.

In this article authors have explored the current status of WA and derived deeper insights from it. This study contributes to the development of targeted interventions and policies to promote women’s empowerment in agriculture and Agripreneurship in Maharashtra and other regions of India.

Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centres (AC&ABC) Scheme

The AC&ABC scheme was launched by the Government of India in 2002 as a comprehensive program to encourage and support agricultural entrepreneurship (agripreneurship) among qualified agricultural graduates. Administered by the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare (MoA&FW) and implemented through the National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), the AC&ABC scheme addresses the challenges faced by the agricultural sector in India by creating self-employment opportunities for agriculture graduates and providing much-needed support services to the farmers.

The objectives of the AC&ABC scheme include creating self-employment opportunities for unemployed agricultural graduates, promoting agripreneurship, providing professional agricultural extension and advisory services to farmers, and supporting innovation and adoption of new technologies in agriculture. To achieve these objectives, the scheme offers comprehensive and intensive residential training programs through selected partner institutions called Nodal Training Institutes (NTIs) across the country free of cost for 45 days. The training covers various aspects of agriculture, including agri clinic (agro advisory centre), agribusiness centre (agri input retail store) crop production, livestock and poultry management, marketing, finance, and project management.

Upon successful completion of the training, agripreneurs are eligible to access credit facilities which is loan up to ₹20 lakhs (approx. $ 24,000/-) for individual projects and up to ₹ 1 crore (approx. $1,21,000/-) for group projects, for establishing their agri-ventures. The scheme provides a subsidy on bank loans to reduce the financial burden on the agripreneurs. The subsidy rate varies depending on the category of the entrepreneur: 44% for women agripreneurs, 36% for general category male agripreneurs, and 44% for agripreneurs belonging to Scheduled Caste (SC), Scheduled Tribe (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC). This higher subsidy rate for women entrepreneurs is designed to encourage their participation in Agripreneurship. The remaining amount is financed through bank loans, with a repayment period of up to 7 years, including a moratorium of two years. Moreover, the agripreneurs receive continuous support and guidance from MANAGE and the NTIs through regular monitoring, evaluation, and capacity-building initiatives.

There are a total of 83,422 candidates trained under the scheme (by November 2022), of which 36,354 people established businesses, representing a success rate of almost 43.5%. off the 83,422 trained candidates, 7,178 were women. Among women candidates, 2,403 established agri-ventures.

Literature Review

We have reviewed the research work done on WA, and the AC&ABC scheme. We focused on the important role of women in agriculture, the challenges they face, and the impact of the AC&ABC scheme on promoting Agripreneurship. Despite the growing body of research on these topics, there is still a need for more in-depth studies on the specific impact of the AC&ABC scheme on WA, as well as the development of strategies to improve their participation and success in the sector. By addressing these gaps, future research can contribute to the design and implementation of more effective policies and interventions that support women’s empowerment and involvement in Agripreneurship in India.

Women’s role in agriculture and Agripreneurship

Numerous studies have emphasized the essential role women play in agriculture, both as farmers and entrepreneurs ^23–28. Their involvement in various agricultural activities, including cultivation, livestock rearing, food processing, and marketing, significantly impacts food security and household well-being in developing countries ²⁹. The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that if women had the same access to resources as men, agricultural output in developing countries could increase by 2.5-4%, potentially reducing the number of undernourished people by 12-17% ²⁹.

In recent years, the phenomenon of the ‘feminization of agriculture’ has been observed in developing countries like India, where women’s participation in agriculture is on the rise ^30–33. This trend has been attributed to several factors, such as male out-migration to urban areas for non-farm jobs, leaving women to manage the agricultural activities at home ^34–36. Furthermore, women are increasingly participating in Agripreneurship, creating additional income-generating opportunities, and contributing to rural development ³⁷.

Women’s involvement in agriculture is also associated with sustainable agricultural practices, such as the use of organic farming techniques, crop diversification, and agroforestry ^38–41. These practices not only contribute to increased agricultural productivity but also help mitigate the effects of climate change, improve soil health, and promote biodiversity ^42,43. By incorporating traditional knowledge and adopting innovative practices, women play a crucial role in ensuring the sustainability of agriculture and the resilience of rural communities ⁴⁴.

Empowering women in agriculture has been shown to have a positive impact on agricultural production, household food security, and overall well-being ^45,46. Women’s empowerment, measured by indicators such as decision-making power, access to resources, and control over income, is associated with improved agricultural outcomes, better nutrition, and enhanced educational opportunities for children ⁴⁷. As women’s roles in agriculture and Agripreneurship continue to expand, it becomes increasingly important to understand and address the challenges they face to ensure their full participation and contribution to the sector.

Challenges faced by women in Agripreneurship

Women in agriculture often face numerous challenges, such as limited access to finance, land, training, technology, and market information ^9,10. Gender bias, discrimination, and stereotypes further exacerbate these challenges, hindering women’s success in Agripreneurship ⁴⁸. The gender gap in agriculture refers to the disparities between men and women in terms of access to resources, opportunities, and benefits within the agricultural sector. Women play a vital role in agriculture, contributing significantly to food production, processing, and marketing activities ⁴⁰. However, they often face numerous barriers that limit their involvement and success in the sector, leading to a persistent gender gap. A few challenges are mentioned below.

Access to land and resources: Women often face challenges in obtaining secure land rights, which can hinder their ability to invest in and manage agricultural activities. In many countries, customary and legal norms restrict women’s access to land ownership or inheritance, putting them at a disadvantage compared to men ⁴⁹.

Access to finance: Limited access to credit and financial services is another significant barrier faced by women in agriculture ⁵⁰. Due to gender biases and lack of collateral (often linked to land ownership), women may find it more challenging to secure loans to invest in their agricultural activities ⁵¹.

Access to education and training: Women may have limited access to agricultural education, training, and extension services due to gender stereotypes, social norms, or logistical constraints ^52,53. This can result in knowledge gaps and hinder their ability to adopt new technologies and practices that could improve productivity and income.

Access to markets and networks: Women may face challenges in accessing markets and networks due to social norms, mobility constraints, or limited market information ⁵². This can limit their ability to sell their produce at competitive prices and engage in profitable value chains.

Cultural and social norms: Gender biases, discrimination, and stereotypes can create additional challenges for women in agriculture ¹⁰. Women may be expected to prioritize household and care responsibilities over their agricultural activities, limiting the time and energy they can dedicate to farming and entrepreneurship.

Limited decision-making power: In many contexts, women may have limited decision-making power within households and communities, restricting their ability to make strategic choices regarding agricultural activities ⁵⁴. This can further exacerbate the gender gap in agriculture.

Impact of the AC and ABC scheme

Research on the AC&ABC scheme has mainly focused on its overall impact on promoting Agripreneurs and Agripreneurship in India ^55–61. These studies have shown that the AC&ABC scheme has contributed significantly to the growth of agripreneurship by empowering agricultural graduates and promoting the establishment of numerous agri-ventures across the country.

Women’s in the AC&ABC scheme

Few studies have examined the impact of the AC&ABC scheme on WA ⁶². However, it is known that the scheme has made efforts to encourage women’s participation by offering higher subsidy rates, reserved seats in training programs, and targeted capacity-building initiatives ⁶³.

Previous research has highlighted the critical role of women in agriculture and Agripreneurship, the barriers they face, and the potential of the AC&ABC scheme to support their efforts ^62,64. However, there is a need for in-depth research to understand the specific impact of the AC&ABC scheme on women’s Agripreneurship and identify strategies for further improving their participation and success in the agriculture sector.

Methodology

This study aims to explore the gender aspect of the AC&ABC scheme, assess women’s participation state-wise, and examine socio-economic features, temporal distribution, geographical distribution, and demographic characteristics of women agripreneurs from Maharashtra State, India. The need for the study arises from the under-representation of women in the agricultural sector and the limited opportunities available to them. The AC&ABC scheme offers women access to training, subsidies, and credit to establish agribusiness ventures. The study’s objective is to evaluate the scheme’s impact on WA and identify factors affecting their success. By understanding these characteristics, the study aims to provide insights for designing effective policies and programs that empower women in agriculture, agripreneruship and promote sustainable development.

Data Collection

The Centre for Agripreneurship Development (CAD) hosted at National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE) maintains the entire data pertaining to the number of candidates enrolled for the program, trained candidates, number and details of ventures established by the agripreneurs, etc. of the scheme. The data from inception of the scheme, i.e. April 01, 2002 till November 25, 2022 was collected from CAD for this study.

The entire population data of 83,422 trained candidates under the scheme, pan India, was collected and was filtered for segregation of data of women. We got the data of 7,178 women candidates present pan India. From data of all women from India, state wise data was filtered. The data of 2112 women candidates was obtained for Maharashtra State. Maharashtra State hold top spot among all states in India for AC&ABC schemes success. This dataset was analyzed, tabulated and graphically represented.

Results and Discussion

Exploring the Gender Aspect of the AC&ABC Scheme in pan India

The AC&ABC scheme aims to generate rewarding self-employment opportunities for unemployed youth with educational background of agriculture and allied sectors. As of November 2022, the scheme had trained 83,422 candidates, with 36,354 successfully launching agriventures, achieving an impressive 43.5% success rate. Among the trained candidates, 76,244 were male, with 33,951 of them establishing businesses and a success rate of 44.5%. Conversely, only 7,178 women agri-graduates, or 8.6% of the total trained candidates, underwent two months of training across the country. Of these women, 2,403 successfully founded agriventures, resulting in a 33.5% success rate Table 1.

Table 1: Present state-wise status of women in Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme

Name of the State	Trained Women		Agri-Venture Established by Women		Success Rate (%)
	No.	(%) Distribution to total	No.	(%) Distribution to total
Chandigarh	1	0.0	1	0.0	100.0
Puducherry	20	0.3	14	0.6	70.0
Maharashtra	2112	29.4	968	40.3	45.8
Tamil Nadu	1578	22.0	680	28.3	43.1
Chhattisgarh	102	1.4	42	1.7	41.2
Bihar	356	5.0	139	5.8	39.0
Karnataka	250	3.5	80	3.3	32.0
Haryana	13	0.2	4	0.2	30.8
Rajasthan	151	2.1	45	1.9	29.8
Uttarakhand	27	0.4	8	0.3	29.6
Gujarat	88	1.2	25	1.0	28.4
Madhya Pradesh	118	1.6	33	1.4	28.0
Goa	4	0.1	1	0.0	25.0
West Bengal	107	1.5	25	1.0	23.4
Uttar Pradesh	155	2.2	33	1.4	21.3
Andhra Pradesh	428	6.0	85	3.5	19.9
Telangana	488	6.8	95	4.0	19.5
Punjab	43	0.6	8	0.3	18.6
Manipur	187	2.6	34	1.4	18.2
Kerala	93	1.3	16	0.7	17.2
Assam	168	2.3	28	1.2	16.7
Jharkhand	135	1.9	16	0.7	11.9
Nagaland	40	0.6	3	0.1	7.5
Odisha	95	1.3	5	0.2	5.3
Meghalaya	20	0.3	1	0.0	5.0
Jammu & Kashmir	306	4.3	14	0.6	4.6
Himachal Pradesh	47	0.7	0	0.0	0.0
Mizoram	30	0.4	0	0.0	0.0
Arunachal Pradesh	14	0.2	0	0.0	0.0
Delhi	2	0.0	0	0.0	0.0
Overall	7178	–	2403	–	33.5

Note: *The period for analysis is considered from AC &ABC scheme inception (01-04-2002 ) to till  25-11-2022

Source: ACABC Cell, MANAGE

Assessing State-Wise Participation of Women in the AC&ABC Scheme

An analysis of the data showed that Maharashtra led the top five states with the highest number of trained women candidates, totaling 2,112 (Fig.1.).

Figure 1: State wise distribution women under Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme in India Click here to view Figure

Tamil Nadu followed with 1,578, Telangana with 488, Andhra Pradesh with 428, and Bihar with 356. Maharashtra also has the highest number of women-led agri-venture establishments at 968, trailed by Tamil Nadu at 680, Bihar at 139, Telangana at 95, and Andhra Pradesh at 85 (see Fig 1.). The analysis disclosed that the scheme’s implementation success varied across states, with Maharashtra achieving the highest overall success rate of 45.8% and Tamil Nadu close behind at 43.1%. Conversely, Chandigarh, Delhi, Goa, Haryana, and the seven sister states of India reported poor results in both the number of trained candidates and established agri-ventures under the AC&ABC scheme. This underperformance could be attributed to a scarcity of interested agri-graduates and National Training Institutes (NTIs).

Recent research underscores the positive influence of women’s involvement in agriculture on food security and rural development ⁶⁵. Additionally, studies indicate that women’s participation in agribusiness leads to increased income, strengthened decision-making power, and elevated social status ⁶⁶. The AC&ABC scheme’s success in states like Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu is better as it demonstrates the empowerment of women in agriculture. However, the weak performance of states such as Chandigarh, Delhi, and Goa highlight the necessity for focused efforts to boost women’s participation in these areas. Furthermore, measures should be taken to augment the availability of agri-graduates and National Training Institutes in underperforming states, ensuring the scheme’s effective implementation.

Assessing Women’s Participation in the AC&ABC Scheme with a Focus on Maharashtra State:

Demographic characteristics (Age-wise Distribution)

Our study found that women aged 18-24 established 461 businesses, while those aged 25-31 started 380 agri-ventures (fig.2.).

Figure 2: Age wise distribution of women under Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme in the state of Maharashtra, India Click here to view Figure

A. Number of women candidates trained and Number of Agri-Venture established by women segmented by age

The age group 53-60 exhibited the highest success rate at 66.7%, followed by the 39-45 age group with a success rate of 59.2%.

B. Success rate of turning trained women into agripreneurs segmented by age

Although there were fewer trained women in these groups, a significant percentage became successful entrepreneurs. The study concluded that older female entrepreneurs are as successful as younger ones, with success chances increasing in later life stages ⁶⁷.

These findings align with previous research on women entrepreneurship in India, indicating that younger women are more likely to engage in entrepreneurial activities ⁶⁸. However, success rates diverged by age, with the 53-60 age group showing the highest success rate, followed by the 39-45 age group (Fig 2(B)). Despite the smaller number of trained women in these groups, a significant portion achieved entrepreneurial success.

These results support the idea that age is not an entrepreneurship barrier, and older women entrepreneurs can be as successful as younger ones. In fact, the chances of success might be higher for women entrepreneurs in later life stages ⁶⁷. This is consistent with past research, which found that older entrepreneurs may have valuable experience and networks beneficial for starting and growing a business ⁶⁹.

Socioeconomic characteristics (Educational Level and Stream-Wise Distribution)

The majority of trained women candidates held bachelor’s degrees, but those with diplomas achieved a higher success rate of 53.95% in establishing agriventures (Fig. 3).

Figure 3: Educational level of the women trained under Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme in the state of Maharashtra, India Click here to view Figure

Further it is revealed from the study that diploma holders received more loans compared to those with bachelors, masters, or doctoral degrees (data not shown). In Maharashtra under the AC&ABC scheme, 87.5% of trained women were from the agriculture stream, while only 3.2% were from the horticulture stream. This pattern persisted in business establishment, with agriculture-background women having the highest number of agriventures, followed by those with horticulture backgrounds (3.0%).

Table 2: Stream-wise distribution of women of Maharashtra in Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme

S. No.	Name of the Degree	Women Trained		Agri ventures established by women enterpreners
		No.	(%) Distribution to total	No.	(%) Distribution to total
1	Ag. Engineering	20	0.9	5	0.6
2	Ag. Marketing	3	0.1	1	0.2
3	Agriculture	1847	87.5	850	87.9
4	Animal Husbandry	26	1.2	12	1.3
5	Biotechnology	20	0.9	6	0.7
6	Botany	25	1.2	12	1.3
7	Chemistry	25	1.2	13	1.4
8	Dairy Technology	22	1.0	14	1.5
9	Environmental Science	1	0.0	0	0.0
10	Fisheries	7	0.3	3	0.4
11	Food and Nutrition	2	0.1	1	0.2
12	Food technology	6	0.3	2	0.3
13	Forestry	6	0.3	2	0.3
14	Home Science	4	0.2	0	0.0
15	Horticulture	68	3.2	30	3.1
16	Intermediate	0	0.0	0	0.0
17	Management	0	0.0	0	0.0
18	Micro Biology	2	0.1	1	0.2
19	Rural science	0	0.0	0	0.0
20	Seed Technology	4	0.2	4	0.5
21	Sericulture	0	0.0	0	0.0
22	Zoology	24	1.1	12	1.3
	Grand Total	2112	–	968	–

Note: *The period for analysis is considered from AC &ABC scheme inception (01-04-2002 ) to till  25-11-2022

Source: ACABC Cell, MANAGE

Additionally, the research found that more diploma holders secured loans than those with higher academic degrees, possibly because diploma holders are often trained in specific trades and may need financial support to start businesses.

Regarding stream-wise distribution, the study reported that the vast majority (87.5%) of trained women came from the agriculture stream, with only a small percentage (3.2%) from the horticulture stream. This pattern was also reflected in agriventure establishments, with women from agriculture backgrounds leading in the number of agriventures, followed by those from horticulture backgrounds.

These findings suggest that the AC&ABC program offers opportunities for women with agriculture backgrounds to become successful entrepreneurs. However, it might be beneficial to explore methods of encouraging women from other streams, like horticulture, to participate in the program and establish their own agriventures.

This study provides essential insights into the educational level and stream-wise distribution of women entrepreneurs in Maharashtra under the AC&ABC program. The findings indicate that practical skills gained through diplomas or vocational training can be valuable in entrepreneurship and that there is a need to encourage women from non-agricultural streams to participate in the program. The study serves as a solid foundation for future research into the factors contributing to the success of women entrepreneurs in India, with a focus on broadening opportunities for those from diverse educational backgrounds and further promoting their involvement in the AC&ABC scheme.

Table 2 presents the stream-wise distribution of women in Maharashtra who participated in the Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme, and the agri ventures established by them. The table provides information about the number and percentage of women trained in each degree stream and the number and percentage of agri ventures established by women entrepreneurs. The data covers the period from the inception of the AC&ABC scheme in 2002 till 25th November 2022.

The data indicates that out of 2112 women who participated in the scheme, 1847 (87.5%) were trained in Agriculture, followed by Horticulture (3.2%), Zoology (1.1%), and Animal Husbandry (1.2%). On the other hand, in terms of agri ventures established, the highest percentage was in Agriculture (87.9%), followed by Horticulture (3.1%), and Animal Husbandry (1.3%).

The table also highlights that only a small percentage of women were trained in streams such as Agri Engineering (0.9%), Chemistry (1.2%), and Dairy Technology (1.0%). However, these streams also saw a modest percentage of agri ventures established by women entrepreneurs.

Overall, the table provides important insights into the degree streams that have been most effective in encouraging women’s participation in the AC&ABC scheme and the types of agri ventures they have established. This information can be useful in designing targeted training programs for women in Maharashtra and other states to increase their participation in agri-business and entrepreneurship.

Temporal distribution of women trained and venture establishment in Maharashtra

Over the past two decades, Maharashtra has experienced a substantial increase in the number of women trained and establishing agriventures through the Agri-Clinics and Agri-Business Centers (AC&ABC) program (Fig. 4-A).

Figure 4: Temporal distribution of women from Maharashtra under Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme since year 2002 to 2022 Click here to view Figure

Temporal distribution of Number of women candidates trained and Number of Agri-Venture established by women

Temporal distribution of success rate of trained women turning into agripreneur

Between 2012 and 2022, the number of women trained in Maharashtra grew by 316.667%, with the number of women-led ventures increasing by 311.765%. However, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the program in 2022, leading to a significant decrease in trained women and new agriventures.

Economic Characteristic (Activity wise distribution)

The table 3 and Fig. 5 provides the activity-wise distribution of agri-venture established by women in Maharashtra under the Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme. Out of a total of 968 agri-ventures established by women, the majority (43.7%) are in the Dairy/ Poultry/ Piggary/ Goatary category.

Figure 5: Activity wise distribution of number of Agri-Venture established by women under Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme in the state of Maharashtra, India. Click here to view Figure

This is followed by Agri-Clinics (23.3%) and Agri-Clinics and Agri Business Centres (14.9%).

Table 3: Activity-wise distribution Agri-venture established by women of Maharashtra in Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme.

S. No.	Activity	Agri-Venture Established by Women
		No.	(%) Distribution of total
1	Dairy/Poultry/Piggary/Goatary	423	43.7
2	Agri-Clinics	226	23.3
3	Agri-Clinics and Agribusiness Centres	144	14.9
4	Nursery	44	4.5
5	Value Addition	27	2.8
6	Veterinary Clinics	18	1.9
7	Vermicomposting / Organic manure	15	1.5
8	Farm Machinery Unit	12	1.2
9	Crop Production	8	0.8
10	Landscaping + Nursery	6	0.6
11	Organic Production/ Food Chain	6	0.6
12	Bio-fertilizer production and Marketing	5	0.5
13	Mashroom Cultivation	5	0.5
14	Fisheries Development	4	0.4
15	Vegetable Production and Marketing	4	0.4
16	Horticulture Clinic	3	0.3
17	Pesticides Production and Marketing	3	0.3
18	Agro-Eco Tourism	2	0.2
19	Direct Mkt	2	0.2
20	Floricultrue	2	0.2
21	Production & Marketing of Bio-Control Agents	2	0.2
22	Agriculture Journalism	2	0.2
23	Sericulture	2	0.2
24	Animal Feed Unit	1	0.1
25	Fishery clinic	1	0.1
26	Soil Testing Laboratory	1	0.1
	Grand Total	968	100

Note: *The period for analysis is considered from AC &ABC scheme inception (01-04-2002 ) to till  25-11-2022

Source: ACABC Cell, MANAGE

It is interesting to note that only a small percentage of ventures are in the areas of Soil Testing Laboratory, Animal Feed Unit, Fishery Clinic, Floriculture, Agro-Eco Tourism, and Pesticides Production and Marketing. This suggests that there may be untapped opportunities in these areas for women entrepreneurs in the agriculture sector.

Overall, the data suggests that women in Maharashtra are actively participating in the Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme and are involved in a wide range of agricultural activities. The distribution of ventures across various activities provides insights for policymakers and other stakeholders to design targeted interventions that can further encourage and support women’s participation in agribusiness.

The ACABC program in the Maharashtra state revealed that the livestock farming activities such as dairy, poultry, pig farming, and goat rearing were the most favored options among women agripreneurs, constituting 43.7% of the total choices. The subsequent most preferred ventures were agri-clinics and agribusiness centers (23.3%) and agri-clinics alone (14.9%). The surge in popularity for agri-clinics can be primarily attributed to their low investment and risk factor, as they offer consultation services and input supply, leading to prompt revenue generation without any gestation period. Other undertakings were less popular owing to an unsuitable environment, inferior product demand, and scope, as stated by Bairwa et al., 2014⁷⁰.

Recent studies have also reported similar findings regarding the popularity of dairy and poultry farming among women agripreneurs in India. A study by Gupta et al., 2019 ⁷¹ found that 60% of women agripreneurs in Rajasthan were engaged in dairy farming, while 40% were involved in poultry farming ⁷². Another study by Kaushik et al., 2021) in Haryana reported that dairy farming was the most popular venture among women agripreneurs, with 68% of them involved in this activity.

The findings of this study regarding the popularity of dairy and poultry farming among women agripreneurs in Maharashtra are consistent with other studies conducted in different regions of India. The popularity of agri-clinics and agribusiness centers as low-cost and low-risk options for starting a business has also been reported in some studies ^74,75. Overall, these findings can help policymakers and development organizations in designing targeted interventions to support women agripreneurs in starting and scaling up their ventures.

Geographical distribution

Women agripreneurs has effectively established agriventures across 26 different categories in agriculture and related sectors, creating women agripreneurs in 34 districts of Maharashtra State.

Table 4. Present district-wise status of Maharashtra women entrepreneur in Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme

S.No.	Name of the District	No. of Agri-Venture Established by Women	No. of villages Covered	No.  of Farmers Covered	No. of People Employed
1	Kolhapur	187	1162	69730	386
2	Sangli	92	499	120188	133
3	Pune	87	690	20572	142
4	Solapur	86	615	13754	146
5	Satara	62	428	13520	131
6	Nagpur	58	376	24324	53
7	Ahmednagar	57	318	23573	103
8	Ratnagiri	54	565	10510	135
9	Sindhudurg	54	315	12439	66
10	Nashik	32	194	11355	81
11	Osmanabad	21	216	3602	112
12	Jalgaon	20	538	6700	17
13	Amravati	16	183	7910	19
14	Raigarh	16	76	1415	34
15	Bhandara	15	103	5340	9
16	Gondia	15	124	4405	18
17	Chandrapur	13	168	4150	12
18	Beed	11	93	4051	23
19	Nanded	10	377	16545	24
20	Akola	8	61	3420	7
21	Aurangabad	8	49	1895	38
22	Dhule	7	107	1010	4
23	Buldhana	6	57	1306	4
24	Mumbai	5	42	188	10
25	Nandurbar	5	360	1870	5
26	Washim	5	50	1200	3
27	Thane	4	53	1370	9
28	Yavatmal	4	311	4815	24
29	Latur	3	17	655	5
30	Gadchiroli	2	70	650	8
31	Wardha	2	17	850	3
32	Hingoli	1	0	0	0
33	Jalna	1	5	250	2
34	Parbhani	1	16	550	1
	Grand Total	968	8255	394112	1767

Note: *The period for analysis is considered from AC &ABC scheme inception (01-04-2002 ) to till  25-11-2022

Source: ACABC Cell, MANAGE

However, the success rate of women agri-entrepreneurs varies by region, with districts in western Maharashtra demonstrating promising results while districts in Vidarbha (excluding Nagpur) and northern Maharashtra exhibit poor performance in terms of venture establishment. Kolhapur, Sangli, Pune, Solapur, Satara, and Nagpur are the leading districts in new business establishments (Table 4 and Fig. 6).

Figure 6: District wise distribution of number of Agri-Venture established by women under Agri Clinics and Agri Business Centre scheme in the state of Maharashtra, India Click here to view Figure

The figure map outlines the development of the Agri Clinics and Agri Business Center scheme across various districts in Maharashtra from its implementation until November 2022.

The Central Sector Scheme, AC&ABC was launched in 2002 by the Central Government to support public extension efforts. This program allowed qualified agricultural professionals to establish agri-ventures that provide value-added extension advisory services directly to farmers and generate self-employment opportunities for agripreneurs. 3,94,112 farmers from 8,255 villages were provided with extension service by 968 female entrepreneurs in the agricultural sector in Maharashtra. The program has effectively increased agricultural extension to farmers and provided them with various indirect benefits. On average, one women agripreneur offers extension services to 405 farmers, and these 968 women entrepreneurs employ 1767 individuals.

The ACABC program has been successful in establishing agriventures in 26 different categories related to agriculture and allied sectors and has created women agripreneurs in 34 districts of Maharashtra. The ACABC scheme has not only provided employment opportunities to women but has also enhanced their status and improved their quality of life ^55,76 . The study found that women agripreneurs who participated in the program reported increased income, improved decision-making abilities, and greater social recognition.

A recent study by Ragasa et al., 2013 ⁵⁴ highlights the impact of the ACABC scheme on farmer income and productivity. The study found that farmers who received extension services from women agripreneurs through the ACABC program reported a 36% increase in crop productivity and a 43% increase in income compared to those who did not receive such services.

The ACABC scheme has not only created employment opportunities for women but has also positively impacted the income and productivity of farmers in Maharashtra. However, there is still room for improvement, particularly in regions with poor performance in terms of venture establishment. The government and other stakeholders should continue to support and invest in programs such as ACABC to promote the development of agriculture and allied sectors in the country.

Conclusion

The AC&ABC scheme has emerged as an effective tool for promoting WA in the agriculture sector in India. The scheme has provided training and financial support to thousands of women, enabling them to start and run their own agriventures. The scheme’s success in states like Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu highlights the potential for women’s empowerment through agripreneurship.

However, there is still much work to be done to enhance women’s participation in the scheme, particularly in underperforming states. Policymakers and program managers should focus on providing practical skills training, financial support, and targeted outreach to women from diverse educational backgrounds and streams. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for flexible and innovative approaches to support women entrepreneurs in times of crisis.

Overall, the AC&ABC scheme has made significant strides in promoting WA in India. With continued support and investment, the scheme can help more women realize their entrepreneurial potential and contribute to sustainable rural development and food security.

Policy Implications

Based on the study, the following policy recommendations are suggested to enhance the participation and success of women agriprenres under the AC&ABC scheme

Encourage and promote women’s participation: State governments should take proactive measures to encourage and promote women’s participation in the AC&ABC scheme. This could include targeted outreach and awareness campaigns to attract women to the program and setting targets for women’s participation in the scheme.

Develop gender-sensitive training programs: Training programs under the AC&ABC scheme should be designed to be gender-sensitive, taking into account the specific needs and challenges faced by women agripreneurs. This could include training on gender issues, financial management, marketing, and technology.

Provide access to finance: Access to finance is a critical factor for the success of agribusiness ventures. The government should work with more financial institutions to provide targeted financial products and services to women agripreneurs, including loans, subsidies, and grants. The government could also establish a dedicated fund to support women agripreneurs.

Establish mentorship and networking programs: Mentorship and networking are important for the success of women agripreneurs. The government should establish mentorship and networking programs to connect women agripreneurs with successful entrepreneurs, industry experts, and potential business partners.

Provide access to technology: Access to technology is critical for the success of agribusiness ventures. The government should work with technology providers to develop and provide technology solutions that are accessible and affordable for women agripreneurs.

Monitor and evaluate gender outcomes: The government should monitor and evaluate gender outcomes of the AC&ABC scheme regularly. This could include tracking the number of women enrolled, the success rates of women agripreneurs, and the impact of the scheme on women’s economic empowerment.

Overall, the government should take a proactive approach to address the gender disparities in agriculture and promote women’s participation and success in the agribusiness sector. The AC&ABC scheme provides an opportunity to empower women and promote sustainable and inclusive agricultural development.

Acknowledgment

Authors are thankful to National Institute of Agricultural Extension Management (MANAGE), Hyderabad, Telangana, India for sharing the database and resources for the study.

Funding Source

There is no financial assistance received from any agency or organization.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The manuscript incorporates all datasets produced or examined throughout this research study.

Ethics Approval Statement

This research did not involve human participants, animal, subjects, or any material that requires The ethical approval.

Authors’ Contribution

Dr. Sagar Deshmukh – Conceptualization, project administration, methodology, validation, writing – review & editing. Dr. Kashmiri Jadhav-Data collection, Data analysis, Interpretation, writing – original draft. Dr. Shahaji Phand – Conceptualization, project administration, Proofreading. Dr. K. Sai. Maheshwari – Conceptualization, project administration, Proofreading

References

1. Sectors SS and HC on the A and F, 2022 undefined. Agriculture, Mass Media, and the Economic Development of India. igi-global.com. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/agriculture-mass-media-and-the-economic-development-of-india/295765
2. Bachhav S, Pawar J. A review of agricultural export policy and procedures. Vidyabharati International Interdisciplinary Research Journal . 2021;13(1):954-957. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.viirj.org/vol13issue1/132.pdf
3. Savari M, Sheykhi H, Shokati Amghani M. The role of educational channels in the motivating of rural women to improve household food security. One Health. 2020;10:100150. doi:10.1016/ J.ONEHLT. 2020.100150
   CrossRef
4. Anderson CL, Reynolds TW, Biscaye P, Patwardhan V, Schmidt C. Economic Benefits of Empowering Women in Agriculture: Assumptions and Evidence. Journal of Development Studies. 2021;57(2):193-208. doi:10.1080/00220388.2020.1769071
   CrossRef
5. De Pinto A, Seymour G, Bryan E, Bhandari P. Women’s empowerment and farmland allocations in Bangladesh: evidence of a possible pathway to crop diversification. Clim Change. 2020;163(2):1025-1043. doi:10.1007/S10584-020-02925-W
   CrossRef
6. Jagruti Das, Ajmer Singh. Women Empowerment and Its Impact on Livelihood and Food Security of Households: A Review. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2020;39(40):19-28. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jagruti-Das/publication/ 347785657_ Women_Empowerment_and_Its_Impact_ on_Livelihood_and_Food_ Security_of_Households_ A_ Review/ links/60225af7299bf1cc26b29cc9/Women-Empowerment-and-Its-Impact-on-Livelihood-and-Food-Security-of-Households-A-Review.pdf
7. Ali M, M Kamraju. The Role of Women in Rural Development Programs. ASEAN Journal of Community Service and Education. 2023;2(1):67-84. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://ejournal. bumipublikasinusantara.id/index.php/ajcse/article/view/290
8. Rashida V. Performance analysis of mahila kisan sashaktikaran pariyojana (MKSP) scheme in Thrissur district. Published online 2020. Accessed June 30, 2023. http://14.139.185.57:8080/ jspui/ bitstream/ 123456789/10451/1/174989.pdf
9. Deshmukh SS, Yasodagayathri A, Jalal P. Impact of Agripreneurial Initiatives of Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer’s Welfare, Government of India on Employment Generation.; 2023. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.manage.gov.in/publications/eBooks/ Impact%20of%20 Agripreneurial%20 initiatives. pdf
10. M.Manimegalai, K.R. Sundaravaradarajan. Problems Faced by Women Agri-Entrepreneur in Tamil Nadu: An Economic Analysis. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 2022;11(4):1290-1298. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://european-science.com/eojnss/ article/view/6653
11. Passah KH, Panda NM. A structural relationship model of gender-role orientation and entrepreneurial intention: examining the mediating effect of motivational antecedents in Northeast India. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. 2022;14(2):167-187. doi:10.1108/IJGE-03-2021-0039/FULL/HTML
    CrossRef
12. Gupta N, Etzkowitz H. Women founders in a high-tech incubator: negotiating entrepreneurial identity in the Indian socio-cultural context. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. 2021;13(4):353-372. doi:10.1108/IJGE-11-2020-0181/FULL/HTML
    CrossRef
13. Baral R, Dey C, Manavazhagan S, Kamalini S. Women entrepreneurs in India: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. 2023;15(1):94-121. doi:10.1108/IJGE-05-2021-0079/FULL/HTML
    CrossRef
14. Agarwal S, Lenka U, Singh K, Agrawal V, Agrawal AM. A qualitative approach towards crucial factors for sustainable development of women social entrepreneurship: Indian cases. J Clean Prod. 2020;274:123135. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123135
    CrossRef
15. Rani VS, Sundaram N. Impact of Financial Inclusion on Women Entrepreneurs in India: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 2023;8(6):e02247. doi:10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i6.2247
    CrossRef
16. Chhabra S, Raghunathan R, Entrepreneurship NR and, 2020 undefined. The antecedents of entrepreneurial intention among women entrepreneurs in India. emerald.com. 2021;13(2):187-203. doi:10.1108/IJGE-09-2020-0149
    CrossRef
17. Dhanya K, KR Ashok. Socio-economic Profile of Women Agripreneurs in Western Tamil Nadu. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2022;41(13):08-13. doi:10.9734/IJECC/2022/v12i1030868
    CrossRef
18. Kumar A, Ages RVEWAJT the. Agripreneurship: A Boon to Women Empowerment. isca.co.in. Published online 2022. Accessed July 1, 2023.http://www.isca.co.in/SOC_HU_ SCI/ book/ISBN %20978-93-89817-65-2.pdf#page=82
19. Chakrawarty P, Naberia S, 35) NKY (Up to, 2022 undefined. Socio-economic profile of rural women agripreneurs utilizing micro credit in Jabalpur and Chhindwara district of Madhya Pradesh. thepharmajournal.com. Published online 2022. Accessed July 1, 2023.https://www. thepharmajournal.com/archives/2022/vol11issue3S/PartM/S-11-3-66-834.pdf
20. Singh S, Rana A, Sharma N, Humanities MK, 2022 undefined. A Review on Women Agri-Entrepreneurship: Roles and opportunities in Agriculture for Sustainable Growth in India. researchgate.net. Published online 2022. doi:10.34293/sijash.v10i2.5117
    CrossRef
21. Journal CKMA, 2020 undefined. Motivating factors for women to become agripreneurs. masujournal.org. Published online 2020. doi:10.29321/MAJ.2020.000387
    CrossRef
22. Madhumitha G, … CKIntJCurrM, 2020 undefined. Determinants of Entrepreneurial Behaviour of Women Agripreneurs in Namakkal District, India. researchgate.net. Published online 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.911.168
    CrossRef
23. Rastogi M, Baral R, Banu J. What does it take to be a woman entrepreneur? Explorations from India. Industrial and Commercial Training. 2022;54(2):333-356. doi:10.1108/ICT-03-2021-0022/FULL/HTML
    CrossRef
24. D’Silva R, G Bhat. A systematic review on women entrepreneurship in food processing sector. International Journal of Case Studies in  Business, IT, and Education. 2019;6(2):15-49. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6963752
    CrossRef
25. Bhattacharyya S, … AM skill development in agriculture, 2019 undefined. Importance of skill development in Indian agriculture. ICT and Social Media for Skill Development in Agriculture. Published online 2019:47-62. Accessed July 1, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sangeeta-Bhattacharyya/publication/333843371_Importance_of_Skill_ Development_in_Indian_Agriculture/ links/5d08913592851cfcc61f7727/Importance-of-Skill-Development-in-Indian-Agriculture.pdf
26. Venugopalan M, Bastian BL, Viswanathan PK. The Role of Multi-Actor Engagement for Women’s Empowerment and Entrepreneurship in Kerala, India. Adm Sci. 2021;11(1):31. doi:10.3390/admsci11010031
    CrossRef
27. Aggarwal M, Johal RK. Rural women entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and beyond. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development. 2021;18(4):373-392. doi:10.1108/WJSTSD-04-2021-0039/FULL/HTML
    CrossRef
28. Dahiya S, Panghal A, Sindhu S, Siwach P. Organic food women entrepreneurs-TISM approach for challenges. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy. 2021;15(1):114-136. doi:10.1108/JEC-04-2020-0068
    CrossRef
29. FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture: Women in Agriculture – Closing the Gender Gap for Development.; 2011.
30. Research RSIJ of AS, 2019 undefined. Feminization of Indian agriculture. ijasrm.com. 2019;4. Accessed July 1, 2023. http://ijasrm.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/ IJASRM_V4S7_ 1609_79_83.pdf
31. Padmaja R, Pingali P, Bantilan M, Kasala K. Feminization of agriculture: trends, interpretations and driving forces using micro-level evidence from the VLS villages of India. mel.cgiar.org. Accessed July 1, 2023. https://mel.cgiar.org/uploads/relatedfiles/X8DAmsRuw9FlQvvLTlWelHzfdtMe9F.pdf
32. P Sadhukhan. Feminization of Agriculture. Feminization of Agriculture Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4150430 or http://dx.doi.org/102139/ssrn4150430. Published online 2022. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.18381.87523
    CrossRef
33. Tamuli MM. Feminization of agriculture and employment transitions in rural Assam: issues and challenges. multidisciplinaryjournals.org. 2020;5. Accessed July 1, 2023. https://www.multidisciplinary journals. org/assets/archives/2020/vol5issue3/5-2-13-809.pdf
34. Kumar M. A Study on Extent and Incidence of male migration: Village level Analysis. Wisdom Herald. 2017;8(3):371-378. Accessed July 3, 2023. http://crm.sitbs.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/59-Manoj-Kumar-371-378.pdf
35. Das P. The Role Of Out-Migration And Demographic Dividend: A Study In Rural Assam. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 2023;7(1):213-221. Accessed July 3, 2023. http://mail.journalppw.com/ index.php/jpsp/article/view/15061
36. Sinha S, Vira B. The Rural Non-farm Economy in India Revisited: From Rural Industrialization to Rural Entrepreneurs. Published online 2021:19-38. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://www.cambridge.org/ core/books/reclaiming-development-studies/rural-nonfarm-economy-in-india-revisited-from-rural-industrialization-to-rural-entrepreneurs/C47F027A797996FE582A223995A5E9CF
    CrossRef
37. Chander RK. Income generating activities adopted and constraints faced by women entrepreneurs in Rural Punjab. Journal of Krishi Vigyan. 2020;9(1):311-315. doi:10.5958/2349-4433.2020.00159.2
    CrossRef
38. Flachs A, Panuganti S. Organic aspirations in South India. Economic Anthropology. 2020;7(1):38-50. doi:10.1002/SEA2.12158
    CrossRef
39. Ghosh-Jerath S, Kapoor R, Ghosh U, Singh A, Downs S, Fanzo J. Pathways of Climate Change Impact on Agroforestry, Food Consumption Pattern, and Dietary Diversity Among Indigenous Subsistence Farmers of Sauria Paharia Tribal Community of India: A Mixed Methods Study. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021;5. doi:10.3389/FSUFS.2021.667297/FULL
    CrossRef
40. Bisht IS, Rana JC, Pal Ahlawat S. The Future of Smallholder Farming in India: Some Sustainability Considerations. Sustainability. 2020;12(9):3751. doi:10.3390/su12093751
    CrossRef
41. Bisht IS. Agri-food system dynamics of small-holder hill farming communities of Uttarakhand in north-western India: socio-economic and policy considerations for sustainable development. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 2021;45(3):417-449. doi:10.1080/21683565.2020.1825585
    CrossRef
42. Pandey D, Adhiguru P, Singh B, B Singh. Is traditional agroforestry system of Nagaland bountiful for indigenous and traditional crops species diversity? Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge. 2021;20(3). doi:10.56042/ijtk.v20i3.27696
    CrossRef
43. Raj A, Jhariya MK, Yadav DK, Banerjee A, Meena RS. Agroforestry: A Holistic Approach for Agricultural Sustainability. Sustainable Agriculture, Forest and Environmental Management. Published online 2019:101-131. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6830-1_4
    CrossRef
44. Fiksel J, Sanjay P, Raman K. Steps toward a resilient circular economy in India. Clean Technol Environ Policy. 2021;23(1):203-218. doi:10.1007/S10098-020-01982-0
    CrossRef
45. Aziz N, He J, Raza A, Sui H. A systematic review of review studies on women’s empowerment and food security literature. Glob Food Sec. 2022;34:100647. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100647
    CrossRef
46. Das J, Singh A. Women Empowerment and Its Impact on Livelihood and Food Security of Households: A Review. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. Published online December 16, 2020:19-28. doi:10.9734/cjast/2020/v39i4031108
    CrossRef
47. Bonis-Profumo G, Stacey N, Brimblecombe J. Measuring women’s empowerment in agriculture, food production, and child and maternal dietary diversity in Timor-Leste. Food Policy. 2021;102:102102. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102102
    CrossRef
48. Irshad Ahmad Reshi, Dr T. Sudha. Women Empowerment: A Literature Review. International Journal of Economic, Business, Accounting, Agriculture Management and Sharia Administration (IJEBAS). 2022;2(6):1353-1359. doi:10.54443/ijebas.v2i6.753
    CrossRef
49. Kelkar G, Krishnaraj M. Women, Land and Power in Asia.; 2020. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2OYJEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg= PT5&dq=Women+in+India +often+face+challenges+in+obtaining+secure+ land+rights,+which+can+hinder+their+ability+ to+invest+in+and+manage+agricultural+ activities+ &ots=0BluJij6jI&sig=LGe2bmTwLL NMTNeDYldd1DXtpXk
50. Varangis P, Buchenau J, Ono T, Sberro-Kessler R. Women in Agriculture Using Digital Financial Services. Published online 2021. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://openknowledge.worldbank. org/bitstream/10986/35471/1/Women-in-Agriculture-Using-Digital-Financial-Services-Lessons-Learned-from-Technical-Assistance-Support-to-DigiFarm-Fenix-and-myAgro.pdf
    CrossRef
51. Thapar-Björkert S, Maiorano D, Blomkvist H. Empowerment mechanisms- employment guarantee, women and Dalits in India. Contemp South Asia. 2019;27(4):486-501. doi:10.1080/ 09584935.2019. 1686750
    CrossRef
52. Quisumbing AR, Rubin D, Manfre C, et al. Gender, assets, and market-oriented agriculture: learning from high-value crop and livestock projects in Africa and Asia. Agric Human Values. 2015;32(4):705-725. doi:10.1007/S10460-015-9587-X
    CrossRef
53. Fu X, Akter S. The Impact of Mobile Phone Technology on Agricultural Extension Services Delivery: Evidence from India. Journal of Development Studies. 2016;52(11):1561-1576. doi:10.1080/ 00220388.2016.1146700
    CrossRef
54. Ragasa C, Berhane G, Tadesse F, Taffesse AS. Gender Differences in Access to Extension Services and Agricultural Productivity. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 2013;19(5):437-468. doi:10.1080/1389224X.2013.817343
    CrossRef
55. Savapandit M, M Gogoi. Impact Study on Agricultural Extension Services to Farmers by Agri-Clinic and Agri Business Centres (ACABC Scheme)–A Study in Assam.; 2017. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://aercnei.aau.ac.in/uploads/reports/Impact-Study-on-Agril-Extn-Services-to-farmers-by-ACABC-in-Assam.pdf
56. Shah D, Sharoff S. Impact of Agri-Clinics and Agri-Business Centres (ACABC) Scheme on Increasing Farmers’ Income in Maharashtra. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 2017;2(3):282-283. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope= site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=09713441&AN=126301118&h= BCL72UP5q3gIQ5LLVun0WBi38 qBu%2Bw5GJwAs2nN6RAC2kaNa NAaJbTu62ixNXRIdWL%2FFb1gl1u0ER5J8D2ZKLg% 3D%3 D&crl=c
57. Patel PK, Patel CR, Chaitra GB, Patil C. Performance of Agriclinics and Agribusiness Centers Scheme in India – A Case of Gujarat. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(2):1541-1549. doi:10.20546/ ijcmas.2020.902.177
    CrossRef
58. Afroz S, Singh R, MS Nain, Mishra JR. Determinants for Agripreneurship Development under Agriclinics and Agribusiness Centers (ACABC) Scheme. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2022;92(2):258-262. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shafi-Afroz/publication/359280713_Determinants_for_Agripreneurship_ Development_under_ Agriclinics_and_Agribusiness_Centers_ ACABC_Scheme/links/ 6233117b4ce552783cc32a1a /Determinants-for-Agripreneurship- Development-under-Agriclinics- and-Agribusiness-Centers-ACABC-Scheme.pdf
    CrossRef
59. Bairwa S, Kushwaha S, LK Meena, Lakra K. Present status of agriclinics and agribusiness centres scheme in India: An Analysis. International Journal of scientific research and management. 2014;2(9):1431-1440. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://www.academia.edu/ download/39038387/ Status_of_ACABC_in_India.pdf
60. Chaitra GB, Patil C, Yeledhalli RA. Attracting and Retaining Youth in Agriculture – A Case of Agriclinics and Agribusiness Centres (ACABC) Scheme in India. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(2):1109-1115. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.902.129
    CrossRef
61. Dumpala SR, Thomas A. Comparative Analysis of Attitude of Agripreneurs towards Agri-clinics and Agribusiness Centres (ACABC) Scheme in Kerala and Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Extension Education. 2019;31(2):6274. doi:10.26725/JEE.2019.2.31.6274-6279
    CrossRef
62. Nidhi R, Jolly M, S Gadhe. Study of Agri-Clinics & Agri-Business Centres for Improving Women Farmers’ Access to Extension Services in Agriculture. Indian Journal of Extension Education. 2017;53(3):67-71. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ijee3&volume=53&issue=3&article=014
63. Prabha R, Rai B, SR Singh. Role of government schemes in Indian agriculture and rural development. Indian Agriculture and Farmers. Published online 2016:92-102. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dr-Rai-2/publication/330684237_ROLE_OF_ GOVERNMENT_ SCHEMES_IN_INDIAN_ AGRICULTURE_AND_RURAL_DEVELOPMENT/ links/5c4f19dba6fdccd 6b5cfedbd/ ROLE-OF-GOVERNMENT-SCHEMES-IN-INDIAN-AGRICULTURE-AND-RURAL-DEVELOPMENT.pdf
64. Chahal V, K Ponnusamy. Study on gender issues in promoting agri-entrepreneurship among farm graduates. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2014;84(6):684-690. Accessed July 3, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kuppusamy-Ponnusamy/publication/293276259_ Study_on_gender_issues_in_promoting_agri-entrepreneurship_among_ farm_graduates/links/ 57ce427208ae057987aac0e1/ Study-on-gender-issues-in-promoting-agri-entrepreneurship-among-farm-graduates.pdf
    CrossRef
65. D’Souza A, Mishra AK, Hirsch S. Enhancing food security through diet quality: The role of nonfarm work in rural India. Agricultural Economics (United Kingdom). 2020;51(1):95-110. doi:10.1111/AGEC.12543
    CrossRef
66. Huyer S. Closing the Gender Gap in Agriculture. Gend Technol Dev. 2016;20(2):105-116. doi:10.1177/0971852416643872
    CrossRef
67. Zhao H, O’Connor G, Wu J, Lumpkin GT. Age and entrepreneurial career success: A review and a meta-analysis. J Bus Ventur. 2021;36(1):106007. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106007
    CrossRef
68. Sharma Y. Women entrepreneur in India. IOSR Journal of Business and Management . 2013;15(3):09-14. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://www.academia.edu/download/46874270/Ind_1.pdf
    CrossRef
69. Schoonjans B, Van Cauwenberge P, Vander Bauwhede H. Formal business networking and SME growth. Small Business Economics. 2013;41(1):169-181. doi:10.1007/S11187-011-9408-6
    CrossRef
70. Bairwa S, Lakra K, Kushwaha S, LK Meena. Agripreneurship development as a tool to upliftment of agriculture. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2014;4(3). Accessed July 4, 2023. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi= 489a58671771ee 786489 46f63d08a4edf44e482e
71. Gupta R, Gupta A. Cooperative Business System of Dairy Sector in India: Role of State, Caste and Gender. Published online 2019. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3427088
72. Kumar M, Dahiya SP, Ratwan P. Backyard poultry farming in India: A tool for nutritional security and women empowerment. Biol Rhythm Res. 2021;52(10):1476-1491. doi:10.1080/09291016. 2019. 1628396
    CrossRef
73. Kaushik S, Rani S, Dahiya R. Entrepreneurship Development of Rural Women through Value Added Dairy Products. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology. Published online May 18, 2021:10-15. doi:10.9734/ajaees/2021/v39i530573
    CrossRef
74. Burman RR, Goswami AK, Sharma JP, et al. Behavioural pattern of farmer entrepreneurs and success factors for establishment of agribusiness ventures under ACABC scheme. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2020;90(9):1653-1657. doi:10.56093/ijas.v90i9.106586
    CrossRef
75. Roy R, Ahmad H. Impact Study on Agricultural Extension Services to Farmers by Agri. Clinics  and Agri. Business Centres (ACABCs) Scheme in Uttar Pradesh.; 2017. Accessed July 4, 2023.
    https://allduniv.ac.in/ckfinder/userfiles/files/Impact_study_on_Agricultural_Extension_Services_to_Farmers_by_Agri_-Clinics_and_Agri_-Business_Centres__ACABCs__Scheme_in_Uttar_Pradesh.pdf
76. Chandrashekara P, PK Durga. A Study of Analysis of Social Benefits of Agri Clinics & Agri Business Centres (AC&ABC) Scheme. Journal of Agricultural Extension Management. 2020;11(2):33-60. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://www.manage.gov.in/publications/journal/jul-dec2020.pdf#page=39