Effect of Bio-Fertilizers on Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum) Production and on Soil Physico-Chemical Properties in Sudan Area of Burkina Faso

Pane Jeanne d’Arc Coulibaly1*, Jacques Sawadogo1, Yémanlou A. I. Bambara2, Wendwaoga B. M. Ouédraogo2, Jean Boukari Legma3, Emmanuel Compaoré1

1Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique/Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (CNRST/INERA), 01 BP 476 Ouagadougou 01 Burkina Faso.

2Institut Polytechnique Privé Shalom (IPS) de Ouagadougou, 11 BP 1435 CMS Ouagadougou 11 – Burkina Faso.

3Université Saint - Thomas - d'Aquin (USTA), Faculté des Sciences et Technologies, 06 BP 10212 Ouagadougou 06, Burkina Faso.

Corresponding Author E-mail : panecoul@yahoo.fr

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.9.1.06

Article Publishing History

Received: 24 Sept 2020
Accepted: 30 Nov 2020
Published Online: 08 Jan 2021

Review Details

Plagiarism Check: Yes
Reviewed by: Dr. Athanasios Kamoutsis Greece
Second Review by: Mr. Olutosin A. Otekunrin Nigeria
Final Approval by: Prof. Surendra Singh Bargali

Article Metrics

Views     PDF Download PDF Downloads: 957

Google Scholar

Abstract:

In Burkina Faso, vegetable production is a very important asset for its socio-economic development. However, this production faces many constraints that negatively affect its potential. The use of organic fertilization appears to be an alternative to address these constraints and could also promote sustainable agricultural production.  In such a context, this study was conducted on tomato using two bio-fertilizers based on local substrates (Bokashi compost and compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum). The objective was to assess the efficiency of the two bio-fertilizers by determining their effects on tomato yield and soil physico-chemical properties. It was conducted from 2018 to 2020 in Soala using a randomized Fischer block design with six treatments in three replications. The treatments were T0 (control), T1 (NPK+urea), T2 (Bokashi compost), T3 (compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum), T4 (T1+T2) and T5 (T1+T3). The results showed that the bio-fertilizers alone contributed to maintain the neutrality of soil pH and very significantly improved its C, N, P and K content. Moreover, in combination with or not with NPK+urea, they influenced significantly plant growth, yield components and yield of tomato compared to T0 plot. In these years of trials, compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in combination with or not with NPK+urea,  was found to be the most improving tomato yield and the increase was more than 300%. This compost could be therefore recommended to farmers in agriculture in general and particularly for vegetable production.

Keywords:

Bokashi Compost; Compost Enriched with Trichoderma Harzianum; Tomato Yield

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Coulibaly P. J. A, Sawadogo J, Bambara Y. A. I, Ouédraogo W. B. M, Legma J. B, Compaoré E. Effect of Bio-Fertilizers on Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum) Production and on Soil Physico-Chemical Properties in Sudan Area of Burkina Faso. Curr Agri Res 2021; 9(1).. doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.9.1.06

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Coulibaly P. J. A, Sawadogo J, Bambara Y. A. I, Ouédraogo W. B. M, Legma J. B, Compaoré E. Effect of Bio-Fertilizers on Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum) Production and on Soil Physico-Chemical Properties in Sudan Area of Burkina Faso. Curr Agri Res 2021; 9(1). Available from: https://bit.ly/3nqEQcU


Introduction

Tomato (Solanum lycorpersicum) is a major vegetable/fruit extensively grown worldwide for human consumption. It is Africa’s most consumed fruit eaten by millions of people (Viskelis1; Tofunmi2) and considered as an important cash crop in sub-Saharan Africa (Venance and Deus3; Dube4; Malherebe and Marais5; Ochilo6). The fruit plays an important role in human nutrition, where it can be eaten as a fresh salad vegetable, processed, stewed, fried, baked and can also be used to produce soup or juice or ketchup (Dube).4 According to these authors, tomato fruit may also be put into various dishes as the main ingredient.

In Burkina Faso especially, tomato is produced all over the country and is an important crop for increasing household resilience and nutrition. It is the second most important vegetable crop after onion (Son)7 and one of the market garden crops grown throughout the country. According to these authors, its national production is evaluated to 289.572 tons on an area of 11.766.4 ha during the 2013–2014 vegetable season. From the northen to the southern parth of the country, tomato production varies and the largest production is found to the northen part with 39.639 tons, representing 25% of the total production of the country (Sawadogo).8 According to these authors, the lowest production is recorded in the southern and central regions, with less than 1% of its total production nationally.

In recent years, several factors are constraining tomato production and its yields have declined from 11.3 t ha-1 in 2010 to 9.7 t ha-1 in 2014 (FAOSTAT).9 This yield decline is due to the increasing pest pressure, the intensified chemical treatments and the high postharvest losses (ranging from 20-60%) (Son10 & 7; Somé11). It is also due to soil fertility decline especially to the decrease in soil organic matter and phosphorus which are the major constraints limiting crop production (Lompo).12 The high pressure on agricultural land also reduces the availability of soil nutrients and causes a significant decrease in soil fertility and crop yields (Bado13; Boga14). Moreover, successive croppings with or without mineral fertilizers contribute to soil acidification and to organic matter depletion (Sawadogo).15 One of the constraints is also the exclusive application of mineral fertilizers which is noted to be generally effective only during the first years of cropping. But few years latter, it leads to a degradation of soil physico-chemical properties and therefore a decrease of crop yields (Sikuzani).16 Regarding this situation, as other crop, it is important to move towards integrated soil fertility management in tomato production. This management could be achieved through the use of organic/bio- fertilizers such as manure and compost. Nowadays, there are some industries specialized in producing improved bio-fertilizers in Burkina Faso. Among these bio-fertilizers, Bokashi compost and compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum are subjected to experimentations to identify the best one able to increase vegetable crop yields. This study aims therefore to evaluate and compare the effect of the two bio-fertilizers on tomato production and on soil fertility.

Materials and Methods

Study Site

We conducted this study in 2017- 2018 and 2018-2019 in Soala (Figure 1), a village in the Centre-west of Burkina Faso, at around 90 km from Ouagadougou.  It is located at 12 °39’18’’ N and 1 °57’37’’ W (Sawadogo)15 in the Sudan Sahel zone with annual rainfall between 600 and 1000 mm. According to Kaboré and Ouedraogo17, this rainfall is badly and irregularly distributed in this area, which is not favourable for cereal crops cultivation. Despite the existence of water resources advantageous to vegetable production, this vegetable production is still in its embryonic stage, but is gradually attracting the attention of producers. The main crops produced are tomato, onion, cabbage, squash, cucumber, eggplant, okra and pepper.

Graph 1: Location of the Study Site (Soala)

Click here to view Figure

Plant Material

We used the tomato variety F1 Mongal (65 days) as plant material. This variety is the most produced in the study site (Soala) and also in the country (Sawadogo).15 Its fruits are flattened round, bright red as colour with a red pulp at maturity.

Pesticides

For pests control, a fungicide was used. This fungicide was a bio-stimulant based on Trichoderma, on organic nitrogen and humic acid. It was used during planting to control soil fungi. In addition, another biopesticide with natural extracts of pine, Mn, B, MaO and D-limonene was used to control some insects with soft-shelled and soft-bodied. Fruit pests were controlled using a biological pesticide based on allium (cepa and sativum) azadiractin, and capsicum annuum. Then, a biological insecticide based on Neem, mustard, pepper, garlic and mint was used to control caterpillars.

Fertilizers Used

Three types of fertilizers were used: two bio-fertilizers (Bokashi compost and compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum) and an inorganic fertilizer (NPK + urea).

Bokashi compost is a fermented organic fertilizer produced from the aerobic or anaerobic degradation of plant or animal materials. It contains a large amount of nutrients and is comparable to NPK fertilizer. It is used to activate and increase the bacterial activity because of its high content in organic matter, in energy and in microorganisms.

The compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum is a beneficial fungus that naturally colonizes the soil. It is very effective when it is allowed to establish itself before the pathogenic fungi arrive and therefore creates a protective sleeve around the roots to prevent the entry of pathogens. The amount of compost used was 30 t ha-1, which is the recommended rate one in tomato production.

The inorganic fertilizer used in the study was NPK (14-23-14) + urea (46% N). These are fertilizers that act on the development of all kinds of plants but they do not affect soil fertility. Depending on their application, each of its chemical elements will have a direct impact on a part of the plants. Then, the N will promote the development of the aerial part of the plants, the P will affect rooting, fruit ripening and the overall resistance of the plant, and the K will influence the resistance to various diseases, stimulate the growth of flowers and fruits. The amount of NPK and urea used was 350 kg ha-1 and 100 kg ha-1 respectively and these are the recommended rates used in tomato production.

Experiment Design and Treatments Applied

This study used a randomized Fisher block design with six treatments in three replications: (1) T0 is the control treatment (without fertilizer), (2) T1: 350 kg ha-1 of NPK + 100 kg ha-1 of urea, (3) T2: Bokashi compost, (4) T3: compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum, (5) T4: Bokashi compost + 175 kg ha-1 of NPK + 50 kg ha-1 of urea and (6) T5: compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum + 175 kg ha-1 of NPK + 50 kg ha-1 of urea.

The plot side was 3 m x 2 m with the planting density of 80 cm between planting lines and 40 cm between plant hills. There were three (03) lines within each plots and seven (07) plant hills on each line with a total of twenty-one (21) plant hills within a plot.

Husbandry Practices

Before planting, tomato seeds were grown in some boxes in which we put a mixture of soil and 1 kg of simple compost. 15 g of tomato seeds were treated with 4 caps of bio-stimulant and sown in six (06) boxes which were covered with star-shaped bags and removed five (05) days after, when the seeds germinated. Then, some lighter bags were used to cover the boxes and removed few days after, when the first leaves appeared. To avoid some pest attacks, a mosquito net was used to protect the nursery which was watered twice a day until 24th day (planting day).

Six days before planting, basal application of bio-fertilizers were applied using Bokashi compost and compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in the plots prepared for the treatments. The plots were then dug and harrowed manually. Seven days after planting (336 tomato plants), the replanting was done in the plant hills where there was some mortality.

The experiment site was fertilized with an amount of 30 t ha-1 of Bokashi compost and compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum applied in single dose. The inorganic fertilizers NPK (at the rate of 300 kg ha-1) and urea (46% of N) were used in single dose (for urea at 28 days after planting) and in two equal half dose at 14 and 28 days after planting (for NPK).

For weed and pest management, all operations were done manually. Some bio-pesticides such as SOLSAIN was used to protect the seeds, and LIMONSAIN, PIOL and BIOPODER were used to control caterpillars, termites and other insects.

Soil Sampling and Laboratory Analyses

Two composite soil samples were taken before sowing at horizon 0-20 cm. After harvest, soil samples were again taken from all treatments and also at horizon 0-20 cm. The samples were air-dried and ground to pass a 2 mm and 0.5 mm sieve. The samples were analyzed at the INERA Kamboinsé Soil Water and Plant analysis laboratory for pH, soil organic carbon (C), total nitrogen (N), total and available phosphorus (P), and total potassium (K).

These analyses were done using standard analytical procedures. C was determined using the Walkley and Black method. The pH was measured with a pH-meter (WTW InoLab, Weilheim, Germany). After mineralization of soil samples, P and N were determined in the digest with a SKALAR automatic colorimeter (Skalar SANplus Segmented flow analyser, Model 4000-02, Breda, Holland), K was determined using a flame photometer, and available phosphorus was determined by the Bray-1 method.

Measurements and Data Collection

The data collected for the experiment were plant height, plant diameter, the length and width of the fruit, and yield. For plant height and diameter, the measurement was done on 15 feet within each plot at 20, 35, 50 and 65 days after planting. The length and width of the fruit were randomly measured on five fruits within each plot on the harvest days. These fruits were measured longitudinally and transversely. The yield, converted in hectare, was estimated per treatment after each harvest. The formula used for the calculation was:

Where 31250 is the number of the feet/ha; and 1/1000 is the conversion factor in kg.

Statistical Analysis

Data collected were subjected to a simple descriptive analysis and a one-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Sokal18; Matsoukis19; Matsoukis20) using Rstudio software version 1.1.423 coupled with R 3.4.3 software. When a significant difference was observed among treatments for a trait, ANOVA was supplemented by the Tukey test (Abdi21; Matsoukis22; Alevizos23). The X value of each sample was assigned a superscript letter (X(i) where i = a, b, c, …). Then, the means were compared using the Newman-Keuls test, whose significance level chosen for the analyses was 5%. The degree of freedom was n-k where n and k represented the observation and group numbers. Prior to these analyses, data were tested for normality (Shapiro24; Shapiro25) and variance homogeneity (Brown).26

Results

Effect of Bokashi Compost and Compost Enriched with Trichoderma Harzianum on Soil pH and Chemical Properties

The analysis of variance performed on the data shows the following results on the bio-fertiilizers (Table 1) and on soil pH and chemical properties (Table 2).

With regards to the bio-fertilizers, the analysis revealed a basic nature of Bokashi compost and compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum (pH is around 8). The results also indicated that in maturity, the two bio-fertilizers had a temperature superior to 25 °C and there was no significance difference in their N content (p>5%) (Table 1). The amount of organic carbon (C) noted was significantly higher (p=0.001) in Bokashi compost than in the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum. However, the C/N ratio showed that the capacity to mineralize this carbon was highly significant in the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum than in Bokashi compost. In  addition, regarding their P and K content, the Table 1 presented a high significance difference (p0,0001) between the two bio-fertilizers. The compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum was found to have the higher content in total N, P and K with a difference of 5.76 g kg-1 and 3.57 mg kg-1 respectively, compared to Bokashi compost.

Table 2 shows soil pH and chemical characteristics before and after the experimentation. Considering the results presented in this Table 2, we noted that the study was carried out on soil with low N and C content and with a neutral pH (pH = 7.2).

In the two years of cultivation, the two bio-fertilizers, in single and in combined use with NPK + urea, contributed to improve significantly (p>5%) soil fertility. Compared with the initial soil sample properties, Bokashi compost and the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum increased all soil properties (total C, N, P, K) measured in this study.

Concerning soil pH, the neutrality was maintained in the treatment using these bio-fertilizers Bokashi compost and the compost enriched with Trichoderma in single use (Table 2). But once combined with NPK + urea in the second year of cultivation, soil pH decreased slightly.

Table 1: Characteristics of the Two Bio-Fertilizers

Bio-fertilizers pH C N P K C/N T
    (g kg-1) (mg kg-1)   (°C)
Bokashi 8.2a 12.25a 0.81a 4.68b 7.85b 15a 26.5a
Enriched with Trichoderma harzianum 7.9a 11.56b 1.08a 10.44a 11.42a 11b 27.6a
Ddl 02
P-Value P> 5% 0.001 P> 5% 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 P> 5%
Significance (5%) * ** * *** ** *** *

Table 2: Soil pH and Chemical Properties as Affected by the Two Bio-Fertilizers

Years Soil properties Treatments     P-Value Significance
T0’ T0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
2017-2018 pH 7.2ab 5.7c 6.3b 6.9ab 7.5a 1E-04 ***
C (g kg-1) 3d 3.8e 4.08b 4.18b 4.57a
N (g kg-1) 0.28bc 0.26c 0.29bc 0.31b 0.36a
P (g kg-1) 135.33b 119.33d 130.55c 135.46b 153a
K (mg kg-1) 1.23a 1.44a 1.44a 1.24a 1.39a P> 5% *
C/N 11d 15a 14b 13c 13c 1E-04 ***
Ddl 5
2018-2019 pH 7.22a 5.33f 5.94e 6.830c 6.95b 6.33d 6.55a 1E-04 ***
C (g kg-1) 3.0d 3.8e 3.05d 3.47c 3.91b 3.46c 4.57a
N (g kg-1) 0.22c 0.23c 0.18d 0.24b 0.29a 0.23c 0.3a
P (g kg-1) 125b 85d 119c 136a 136a 127c 144a
K (mg kg-1) 1.02d 1.13d 1.30c 1.41ab 1.47a 1,32c 1.52a
C/N 14c 16ab 17a 14c 13d 15bc 15bc
Ddl 5

T0’: initial soil sample ; T0: control ; T1: 300 kg ha-1 of NPK + 100 kg ha-1 of urea ; T2 : 30 t ha-1 of Bokashi compost ; T3 : 30 t ha-1 of compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum ; T4 : 30 t ha-1 of Bokashi compost + 175 kg ha-1 of NPK + 50 kg ha-1 of urea ; T5 : 30 t ha-1 of compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum + 175 kg ha-1 of NPK + 50 kg ha-1 of urea ; *: no significance ; **: significance ; ***: high significance. Within rows, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p<5%.

This Table 2 also indicated that the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum was the most improving soil properties content when used alone or combined with NPK + urea. Compared to the initial soil sample, it contributed to increase soil total C, N, P, K by 1.57 g kg-1, 0.08 g kg-1, 17.67 g kg-1 and 0.16 mg kg-1 respectively for the first year 2017-2018 and 0.91 g kg-1, 0.07 g kg-1, 0.11 g kg-1 and 0.45 mg kg-1 respectively for the second year 2018-2019. When combined with NPK + urea, the improvement was even better for total P and K and the content was increased by 19 g kg-1 and 0.50 mg kg-1 respectively in the second year.

Compared to Bokashi compost, the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum increased soil total C, N, P, K contents by 0.39 g kg-1, 0.05 g kg-1, 17.54 g kg-1 and 0.15 mg kg-1 respectively for the first year 2017-2018 and 0.44 g kg-1, 0.06 g kg-1, 0 g kg-1, 0.06 mg kg-1 respectively for the second year 2018-2019. In combination with NPK + urea, similarly to the single use, the improvement was also even better and the content of total C, N, P, K was increased by 1.11 g kg-1, 0.07 g kg-1, 17 g kg-1 and 0.20 mg kg-1 respectively in the second year 2018-2019.

Effect of Bokashi Compost and Compost Enriched with Trichoderma Harzianum on Tomato Growth

The effect of the two bio-fertilizers on tomato plant height (Fig. 1) and plant diameter (Fig. 2) was assessed. The analysis of variance indicated a significant influence (p0,05) of Bokashi compost and the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in single use and in combined use with NPK + urea on plant height and diameter compared to the control and the NPK + urea treatments. In the two years of cultivation, no significant difference was noted between the influence of the two bio-fertilizers in single use on the two parameters (height and diameter) of tomato. However, in the second year 2018-2019, the addition of NPK + urea contributed to improve plant height (Fig. 1) but no significant influence was induced for plant diameter (Fig. 2).

Figure 1 : Tomato Plant Height Measured at Different Growth Periods

Click here to view Figure

 

Figure 2 : Tomato Plant Diameter Measured at 80 DAP

Click here to view Figure

Legend         

P0 : Measuement at 30 days after planting (DAP) ; P1 : Measuement at 45 DAP ; P2 : Measuement at 60 DAP ; P3 : Measuement at 80 DAP ; T0: control ; T1: 300 kg ha-1 of NPK + 100 kg ha-1 of urea ; T2 : 30 t ha-1 of Bokashi compost ; T3 : 30 t ha-1 of compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum ; T4 : 30 t ha-1 of Bokashi compost + 175 kg ha-1 of NPK + 50 kg ha-1 of urea ; T5 : 30 t ha-1 of compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum + 175 kg ha-1 of NPK + 50 kg ha-1 of urea; The bars represent the standard errors ; The graphs with same letters are not significantly different.

Effect of Bokashi Compost and Compost Enriched with Trichoderma Harzianum on the Yield Components of Tomato

Assessing the effect of the two bio-fertilizers on tomato yield components, it was found that the Bokashi compost in combined use with NPK + urea and the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in single use and in combined use with NPK + urea influenced significantly (p0,05) the yield components (fruits height and width) of tomato (Fig. 3).

Figure 3 : The Height and Width of the Fruits of Tomato as Affected by the Treatments in 2018-2019

Click here to view Figure

Regarding the weight of tomato fruit, only the two bio-fertilizers in combined use with NPK + urea presented the highest weight (Fig. 4).  Compared to the single use of the Bokashi compost and the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum, the combination effect contributed to increase their weight by 1312.6 g and 1137.1 g respectively in the second year 2018-2019.  Compared to NPK + urea and the control treatments, the two bio-fertilizers contributed to increase the weight of tomato fruits by 180% and 300% respectively.

Figure 4 : The Weight of Tomato Fruits as Affected by the Treatments in 2018-2019

Click here to view Figure

Legend

Hfruit : Height of the fruits ; Wfruit : the width of the fruits ; T0 : control ; T1: 300 kg ha-1 of NPK + 100 kg ha-1 of urea ; T2 : 30 t ha-1 of Bokashi compost ; T3 : 30 t ha-1 of compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum ; T4 : 30 t ha-1 of Bokashi compost + 175 kg ha-1 of NPK + 50 kg ha-1 of urea ; T5 : 30 t ha-1 of compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum + 175 kg ha-1 of NPK + 50 kg ha-1 of urea; The bars represent the standard errors ; The graphs with same letters are not significantly different.

Effect of Bokashi Compost and Compost Enriched with Trichoderma Harzianum on the Yield of Tomato

Assessing the effect of the two bio-fertilizers on tomato yield, similarly to yield components, it was found that the Bokashi compost in combined use with NPK + urea (in 2018-2019) and the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in single and in combined use with NPK + urea influenced significantly (p0,05) the yield  of tomato (Fig. 5).

Figure 5 : The Yield of Tomato Fruits as Affected by the Treatments

Click here to view Figure

With regards to the first year 2017-2018, the application of the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in single use contributed to increase the yield of tomato by 3 t ha-1 and 8 t ha-1 compared to Bokashi compost and the NPK + urea treatment respectively. Compared to the control treatment, it contributed to increase tomato yield up to 19 t ha-1 (300%).

In the second year 2018-2019, compared to the Bokashi compost, the application of the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in combined use with NPK + urea increase tomato yield up to 10.2 t ha-1. Regarding the yield obtained with NPK + urea and the control tratments, the increase in yield of tomato induced by the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in combined use with NPK + urea was 200% and 400% respecttively (Fig. 5).

Legend

T0 : control ; T1: 300 kg ha-1 of NPK + 100 kg ha-1 of urea ; T2 : 30 t ha-1 of Bokashi compost ; T3 : 30 t ha-1 of compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum ; T4 : 30 t ha-1 of Bokashi compost + 175 kg ha-1 of NPK + 50 kg ha-1 of urea ; T5 : 30 t ha-1 of compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum + 175 kg ha-1 of NPK + 50 kg ha-1 of urea; The bars represent the standard errors ; The graphs with same letters are not significantly different.

Discussion

Effect of Bokashi Compost and Compost Enriched with Trichoderma Harzianum on Yield and Yield Components of Tomato

In the two years of cultivation, the application of the two bio-fertilizers (Bokashi compost and the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum) maintained soil pH neutrality and contributed to increase soil total C, N, P and K and the yield of tomato. The incorporation of these two bio-fetilizers in soil played major role in improving soil fertility, yield attributing characters and thereby final yield. Indeed, the bio-fertilizers are known to enhance the nutrient availability to crop plants and impart better health to plants and soil, hence enhancing crop yields (Suliasih and Widawati27 ; Kamlesh and Sarkar28) as they are modernized forms of organic fertilizers into which beneficial microorganisms have been incorporated. Kalbani29 and Nacro30 reported the best plant growth through the application of organic fertilizers which provide an additional source of nutrients and improve the efficiency of mineral fertilizers by making nutrients more available for plant growth.

The Bokashi compost and the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum are used for vegetables cultivation especially tomato and onion because of their quick decomposition in soil and efficient availability of their nitrogen to vegetables crop. The application of the two bio-fertilizers in single use in 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 brought an impressive increase especially in tomato yield by 300% and more than 200% respectively, compared with the control treatment. From this experiment, it can be said that the application of the two bio-fertilizers gave significant effect to almost all of soil parameters. According to Oviyanti31, this result can happen because of the symbiotic relationship between the fungi and a variety of plants that can produce colonies on the outside part in a root system. This condition can make the uptake of water and nutrients by the plant roots increase.

The best improvement of the yield of tomato in the two years of cultivation was achieved through the application of the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in single or in combined use with NPK + urea. In 2017-2018 and 2018-2019, the increase in tomato yield resulting from this bio-fertilizer was 300 and 400% respectively compared to the control treatment. This result could be linked to the nutrients content in this bio-fertilizer which was found to have the higher content in total N, P and K compared to Bokashi compost. In additin, eventhough the amount of organic carbon (C) noted was significantly higher in Bokashi compost than in the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum, the C/N ratio showed that the capacity to mineralize this carbon was highly significant in the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum than in Bokashi compost. Moreover, this result could be linked to the presence of Trichoderma harzianum in the compost. Indeed, it is a fungus that grows into the soil and can exert spatial and nutrient competition. This finding lend its support to that of Harman32 who studied the influence of Trichoderma harzianum on plants. He successfully demonstrated that this fungus has the ability to release bioactive molecules and facilitate the supply of nutrients. Similarly, Sawadogo15 tested the effect of compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum on tomato plants and showed that the high content of total N, P and K in this bio-fertilizer could be due to Trichoderma harzianum that has the capacity to colonize the environment in which it is found and to promote the mineralization of organic matter. This capacity of Trichoderma harzianum to colonize and increase soil fertility was also reported by Mouria.33

Conclusion

This study was conducted on tomato using two bio-fertilizers based on local substrates (Bokashi compost and compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum) to assess their efficiency on tomato yield components and yield and on soil pH and chemical properties. The results showed that the two bio-fertilizers in single use, contributed to maintain the neutrality of soil pH and increase all its total C, N, P and K content and its yield components and yield. When combined with NPK+urea, it was found that the Bokashi compost and the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in single and in combined use with NPK + urea influenced very significantly the yield of tomato. Moreover, this study revealed that the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum had the most improving soil properties content and tomato yield when used alone or combined with NPK+urea. Compared to the initial soil sample, it contributed to increase soil C, N, P, K by 1.57 g kg-1, 0.08 g kg-1, 17.67 g kg-1 and 0.16 mg kg-1 respectively for the first year 2017-2018 and 0.91 g kg-1, 0.07 g kg-1, 0.11 g kg-1 and 0.45 mg kg-1 respectively for the second year 2018-2019. Compared to Bokashi compost, the NPK + urea and control plots, the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in single use contributed to increase the yield of tomato by 3 t ha-1, 8 t ha 1and 19 t ha-1 (300%) respectively with regards to the first year 2017-2018. In the second year 2018-2019, compared to the Bokashi compost, the application of the compost enriched with Trichoderma harzianum in combined use with NPK + urea increased tomato yield up to 10.2 t ha-1. This compost could therefore be an alternative for soil fertilization in vegetable production and in agriculture in general in Burkina Faso.

Acknowledgement

We are thankful to Mr SAVADOGO W. Arsène, the Administrator of BIOPROTECTB for having accepted this study in its field and for giving us the bio-fertilizers and tomato seed for the experimentations.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Source

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Viskelis P., Radzevicius A., Urbonaviciene D., Viskelis J., Karkleliene R., Bobinas C. Biochemical parameters in tomato fruits from different cultivars as functional foods for agricultural, industrial, and pharmaceutical uses (Chapter 3). Plants for the Future 2015; 45-77.
    CrossRef
  2. Tofunmi I. AgropreneurNg : Showcasing the Pathways to Profitable Agricultural Career. 2019. http://www.tomatonews.com/en/background_47.html viewed on 25 August, 2020.
  3. Venance M., Deus N. Determinants of Farmers’ participation in high value crops in Tanzania. African J Econ Rev. 2015 ;3: 102-116.
  4. Dube J., DDamulira, G., Maphosa M. Tomato breeding in Sub-Saharan Africa – Challenges and opportunities: A review. Afr Crop Sci J. 2020; 28: 131 – 140.
  5. Malherbe S., Marais D. Economics, yield and ecology: A case study from the South African tomato industry. Outlook Agric. 2015; 44: 37–47.
    CrossRef
  6. Ochilo W.N., Gideon N., Nyamasyo B., Kilalo D., Otieno W., Otipa M., Chege F., Karanja T., Eunice K. Characteristics and production constraints of smallholder tomato production in Kenya. Sci Afr. 2019; 2: 1-10.
    CrossRef
  7. Son D., Somda I., Legreve A., Schiffers B. Pratiques phytosanitaires des producteurs de tomates du Burkina Faso et risques pour la santé et l’environnement. Cah Agric. 2017b; 26: 1-6.
    CrossRef
  8. Sawadogo I., Koala M., Dabiré C., Ouattara L.P., Bazié V.B.E.J.T., Hema A., Gnoula C., Palé E., Nébié H.C.R. Etude de l’influence des modes de transformation sur les teneurs en lycopène de quatre variétés de tomates de la région du nord du Burkina Faso. IJBCS. 2015; 9: 362-370.
    CrossRef
  9. Situation de la production de tomates au Burkina Faso. Google Scholar, 2016. Disponible sur http://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/#data/QC.
  10. Son D., Somda I., Legreve A., Schiffers B. Effect of plant diversification on pest abundance and tomato yields in two cropping systems in Burkina Faso: farmer practices and integrated pest management. 2018; 12: 101-119.
    CrossRef
  11. Somé K., Nikiema J., Sawadogo I. Evaluation of tomato varieties for their adaptability to rainy season production in Centre-North and Eastern regions Burkina Faso, Burkina Faso rainy season tomato trial report. Feed the future Innovation lab for horticulture 2019; 1-12.
  12. Lompo F. Effets induits des modes de gestion de la fertilité sur les états du phosphore et la solubilisation des phosphates naturels dans deux sols acides du Burkina Faso Thèse doctorat d’Etat. Université de Cocody, Côte d’Ivoire. 2009.
  13. Bado B.V. Rôle des légumineuses sur la fertilité des sols ferrugineux tropicaux des zones guinéennes et soudaniennes du Burkina Faso Thèse de doctorat. Département des sols et de génie agroalimentaire, Faculté des Sciences de l’Agriculture et de l’Alimentation, Université Laval, Québec, Canada. 2002.
  14. Boga J.P. Étude expérimentale de l’impact de matériaux de termitières sur la croissance, le rendement du maïs et du riz et la fertilité des sols cultivés en savanes sub-soudaniennes, booro-borotou (côte d’ivoire) Thèse de doctorat. Université de cocody, abidjan. 2007.
  15. Sawadogo J., Ouédraogo W.B.M., Coulibaly P.J.A., Savadogo C. A., Kaboré A., Legma J. B. Étude comparative de la qualité de trois amendements organo-biologiques sur la production de tomate à Soala dans le Centre-Ouest du Burkina Faso. Sci Tech Sci Nat Agr. 2019; 38: 35-50.
  16. Amélioration de la qualité des sols acides de Lubumbashi par l’application de différents niveaux de compost de fumiers de poules. J Appl Biosci. 2014; 6523-6533.
    CrossRef
  17. Kabore M., Ouédraogo F.G. Monographie De La Région Du Centre-Ouest. Burkina Faso. 2009.
  18. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. The Principles and Practices of Statistics in Biological Research. Third Edition, WH Freeman and Company, New York, USA. 1995.
  19. Matsoukis A.S., Gasparatos D., Chronopoulou Sereli A. Micronutrient content in relation to specific leaf area, light regime and drenched-applied paclobutrazol in Lantana camara Curr. Agri. Res. J. 2015; 3(2): 101-104.
    CrossRef
  20. Matsoukis A., Kamoutsis A.P., Chronopoulou-Sereli A. A Note on the Flowering of Ajuga orientalis in Relation to Air Temperature in Mount Aenos (Cephalonia, Greece). Curr. Agri. Res. J. 2018; 6(3): 261-267.
    CrossRef
  21. Abdi H., Williams L.J. Tukey’s honestly significant difference (hsd) test. In: Encyclopedia of Research Design Volume 3 (Salkind N., ed.). Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, (USA). 2010: 583-585.
  22. Matsoukis A., Kamoutsis A., Chronopoulou-Sereli A. Air temperature effect on end of flowering of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. In mountainous region of Greece”. Anim Plant Sci. 2018; 28(1): 100-106.
  23. Alevizos I., Paraskevopoulou A.T., Kamoutsis A., Psychogiou M., Londra P. The impact of design on the environmental contribution of street trees in Kallithea, Athens. Acta Hortic. (ISHS) 2017; 1189: 251-256.
    CrossRef
  24. Shapiro S.S., Wilk M.B., Chen H.J. A comparative study of various tests for normality. J Am Stat Assoc. 1968; 63:1343-1372.
    CrossRef
  25. Shapiro S.S., Francia R.S. An approximate analysis of variance test for normality. J Am Stat Assoc. 1972; 67: 215–216.
    CrossRef
  26. Brown M.B., Forsythe A.B. The small sample behaviour of some statistics which test the equality of several means. Technomectrics 1974;16: 129-132.
    CrossRef
  27. Suliasih, Widawati S. The Effect of Biofertilizer Combined with Organic or Inorganic Fertilizer on Growth of Caesalpinia pulcherrima and Bacterial Population in Soil. Earth Environ Sci. 2018; 166 : 1-7.
    CrossRef
  28. Kamlesh K.Y., Smritikana S. Biofertilizers, impact on soil fertility and crop productivity under sustainable agriculture. Environ Ecol. 2019; 37: 89-93.
  29. Kalbani F.O.S.A., Salem M.A., Cheruth A.J., Kurup S.S., Senthilkumar A. Effect of some organic fertilizers on growth, yield and quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Int Lett Nat Sci. 2016; 53: 1-9.
    CrossRef
  30. Nacro S. R. Effets des fertilisants organiques sur la production de la tomate et les parametres chimiques du sol au centre nord du Burkina Faso Mémoire de fin de cycle option agronomie. Université Nazi-Boni/Institut de Déveleppement Rural, Bobo-Dioulasso, 2018.
  31. Oviyanti M., Emma T., Rija S., Benny J. The Effect of Bio-fertilizer on Soil Chemical Properties of Sugarcane in Purwadadi Subang. In International Conference on Sustainable Agriculture and Food Security (2nd): A Comprehensive Approach. KnE Life Sci. 2017; 164–171.
    CrossRef
  32. Harman G.E. Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology 2006; 96: 190-194.
    CrossRef
  33. Mouria B., Ouazzani-Touhami A., Douira A. Effet de diverses souches du Trichoderma sur la croissance d’une culture de tomate en serre et leur aptitude à coloniser les racines et le substrat. Phytoprotection 2007; 88: 103-110.
    CrossRef
scroll to top