Secondary and Micronutrient Management Practices in Organic Farming- An Overview

M. R. Anand*, H.D Shiva Kumar, Poojitha Kommireddy, K.N.Kalyana Murthy

Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, India.

Corresponding Author Email: anandmruas@gmail.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.7.1.02

Article Publishing History

Received: 23/03/2019
Accepted: 29/04/2019
Published Online: 29/04/2019

Review Details

Plagiarism Check: Yes
Reviewed by: Dr. R. K. Mathukia
Second Review by: Dr. Rajiv Rakshit
Final Approval by: Dr. Shiveshwar Pratap Singh

Article Metrics

Views     PDF Download PDF Downloads: 2318

Google Scholar

Abstract:

Modern agriculture, no doubt has paved the way for “Green Revolution”, but it has led to the application of heavy doses of chemical fertilizers and pesticides with the sole objective of maximizing the yield. The unbalanced and continuous use of chemical fertilizers in intensive cropping system is causing deterioration of soil health, multi-nutrient deficiencies, low productivity, poor quality and environmental hazards. Poor quality of food and fodder has caused serious health problems and disorders in both animals and human beings. Now, the agriculture research is focused on evolving ecologically sound, biologically sustainable and socio economically viable technologies like organic farming which includes local organic sources of nutrients without using chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Adoption of organic farming minimizes the environmental pollution and maintain long-term soil fertility by improving soil organic matter and essential plant nutrients including secondary and micronutrients. For producing quality food by sustaining the soil productivity and soil health are the challenges before us on one side and minimizing the pressure on non renewable sources or limited available sources on other hand needs immediate attention by all the stakeholders engaged in agriculture. Application of technologies available in organic farming and use of all locally available organic sources particularly on farm biomass which are rich in secondary and micronutrients will meet the twin objective of quality food production and reducing the pressure on non renewable resources.

Keywords:

Organic Farming; Secondary and Micronutrients; Soil Health; Sustainability

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Anand M. R, Kumar H. D. S, Kommireddy P, Murthy K. N. K. Secondary and Micronutrient Management Practices in Organic Farming- An Overview. Curr Agri Res 2019;7(1). doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.7.1.02

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Anand M. R, Kumar H. D. S, Kommireddy P, Murthy K. N. K. Secondary and Micronutrient Management Practices in Organic Farming- An Overview. Curr Agri Res 2019;7(1). Available from: https://bit.ly/2vu8PbI


Introduction

Organic farming is “a production system that sustains soil health, ecosystem and agriculture production, by relying on ecological processes, biodiversity and natural cycles and adapted to local conditions than use of inputs with adverse effects”.9 FAO suggested that “Organic agriculture is a unique production management system which promotes and enhances agro-ecosystem health, including biodiversity, biological cycles and soil biological activity, and this is accomplished by using on-farm agronomic, biological and mechanical methods in exclusion of all synthetic off-farm inputs”. Agricultural practices of India date back to more than 4000 years, organic farming is very much native to this country. As mentioned in Arthashastra, farmers in the Vedic period possessed a fair knowledge of soil fertility, seed selection, plant protection, sowing seasons and sustainability of crops in different lands. The farmers of ancient India adhered to the natural laws and this helped in maintaining the soil fertility over a relatively longer period of time. The organically cultivated food crops have a vast untapped export potential growing at 10 to 15 per cent per annum.3 From the past two to three decades organic farming is gaining more importance again and the area under organic farming is increasing day by day. Emerging from 42,000 ha under certified organic farming during 2003-04, organic agriculture has grown almost 29 fold during the last 5 years. By 2010 India has brought more than 4.48 million ha area under organic certification process.23

According to the latest FiBL–IFOAM survey on certified organic agriculture worldwide,9 data on organic agriculture are available from 162 countries. There are 57 million hectares of organic agricultural land. The countries with the largest areas of organic agricultural land are Australia followed by Argentina and China. India stands in 9th position with 1.49 m ha (0.8 % of total agricultural land) and including wild collections it is 4.2 mha. India stands in first position with respect to number of producers with 8.35 lakh producers followed by Uganda and Mexico.

There is a good market for organic goods in the world market. Among the different organic products that are exported from the country tea stands in first position with 25% share followed by rice (21%) and fruits and vegetables (15%).19

The reason why the organic products are accepted worldwide is due to their superior quality and nutrition than conventional products. For any plant to produce fruit or grain with good quality and nutrition it needs all the essential plant nutrients.

It is known that plant absorbs small amounts of many elements, but 17 elements are known as essential elements based on Arnon and Stoutcriteria of essentiality.

Primary nutrients

It includes nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium.

Secondary nutrients

It includes calcium, magnesium and sulfur. Calcium (Ca): Involved in cell division and plays major role in maintenance of membrane integrity. Magnesium (Mg): Component of chlorophyll, ribosomes and a cofactor for many enzymatic reactions.Sulfur (S):Constituent of amino acids (cystein, methionine), vitamins, lipoic acid and acetyl co-enzyme A.6

Micronutrients

Micronutrients (trace elements) are needed in tissue concentrations equal to or less than 100 μg g-1 of dry matter. They are referred as micronutrients not because they are less important for plant growth and development, but because they are required in relatively small amounts. They include: Zinc- It is a constituent of several enzymes regulating various metabolic reactions. Iron- An essential component of many hemo and nonhemo Fe enzymes and carriers, including cytochromes and the ferredoxins. Involved in key metabolic functions such as N fixation, photosynthesis and electron transfer. Manganese- Involved in oxygen evolving system of photosynthesis and also influences auxin levels in plants. Copper- It acts as an electron carrier in enzymes and associated with oxidation-reduction reactions. Boron- It is essential for development and growth of new cells in plant meristem. It is associated with translocation of sugars, starch, nitrogen and phosphorus. Molybdenum- It is an essential component of enzyme nitrate reductase in plants. It is also structural component of nitrogenase associated with nitrogen fixation in legumes.Chlorine- Essential for photosynthesis and as an activator of enzymes involved in splitting of water. Associated with osmoregulation of plants growing on saline soils.Nickel- Essential for regulating N metabolism, grain filling and seed viability.6

Table 1: Secondary and micronutrients range in plant and soil.

Nutrients Plant Soil
Low Medium High
Calcium 0.1-1.0 (%) <2 meq >2 meq
Magnesium 0.1-0.4 (%) <1 meq >1 meq
Sulphur 0.1-0.3 (%) <10 ppm 10-15.6 ppm >15.6 ppm
Zinc (ppm) 20-100 <0.6 0.6-1.2 >1.2
Iron (ppm) 20-250 <4.5 4.5-9.0 >9.0
Manganese (ppm) 20-300 <3.5 3.5-7.0 >7.0
Copper (ppm) 2-20 <0.2 0.2-0.4 >0.4
Boron (ppm) 10-100 <0.5 0.5-1.0 >1.0
Molybdenum (ppm) 0.1-0.5 <0.2 0.2-0.4 >0.4
Chlorine (ppm) 2000-20000
Nickel (ppm) 0.1-0.2

(Seenappa et al., 2019)

Secondary and micronutrients management practices in organic farming

In organic farming chemical fertilizers are not allowed and only organic manures and organic fertilizers are allowed. So whatever might be the nutrient requirement of the crops, it has to be supplied through organic sources only.Generally organic sources are referred as complete plant food as they contain all the essential plant nutrients. Different nutrient management practices followed in organic farming for secondary and micronutrient management are application of FYM, compost, oil cakes, liquid organic manures, biofertilizers, animal manures and organically approved amendments, cropping system management viz., green manures(One season in a year), crop rotation, intercropping, crop residues management as mulch.3

1. FYM (Farm Yard Manure) is a well decomposed mixture of dung and urine of farm animals along with other farm wastes. It is the basic organic nutrient source available in most of the farms. The nutrients in manure can vary depending on the animal type, health, age, feed ration, bedding and water content. In addition, the various management practices associated with handling manure, manure storage, duration of storage, application amount, application technique and weather can all dramatically alter the nutrient content in manure and thus the amount of nutrients available in the soil and for future crop use. Understanding and applying the correct amount of manure to your fields can be accomplished by testing your manure prior to application.

The farm yard manure generally has 2.3 % Ca, 0.92 % Mg, 0.44 % S, 803.6 ppm Fe, 1312 ppm Mn, 132.4 ppm Zn and 30.4 ppm Cu along with nitrogen (0.90 %), phosphorus (0.63 %) and potassium (0.98 %).14

Table 2: Composition of the FYM, green manures, crop residues and mineralized sulfur as percentage of sulfur added to soil through various organic amendments.

Organic material Scontent (%) C:N ratio C:S ratio Amount of S added (mgkg-1soil-1) % of added S mineralized(16 weeks after incubation)
Vertisol Inceptisol
FYM 0.282 10.5 88.6 28.2 67.3 63.5
Subabul 0.242 12.2 157.0 24.2 55.5 53.6
Gliricidia 0.191 12.1 178.0 19.1 55.1 50.3
Soybean straw 0.097 34.9 371.1 9.7 -39.1 -20.9
Wheat straw 0.072 79.8 598.6 7.2 -109.0 -56.4

(Kotha Sami Reddy et al., 2002)

The total sulfur mineralized in amended soil varied considerably depending on the type of organic materials incorporated and soil used. Sulfur mineralization expressed as a percentage of sulfur added to the soils was highest in FYM treated soils (63.5 to 67.3 %). The percentage of S mineralization from subabulloppings was higher than that from gliricidialoppings. Regression analysis clearly indicated the dependence of S mineralization on the C:S ratio of the organic material added to the soil. Soybean and wheat straw recorded net negative mineralization i.e., immobilization due to wider C: N and C:S ratio.11

2. Compost is an organic matter that has been decomposed in a process called composting. This process recycles various organic materials which otherwise regarded as waste products and produces a soil conditioner. The decomposition process is aided by shredding the plant matter, adding water and ensuring proper aeration by regularly turning. There are different types of compost available like, Vermicompost, Rural compost and Urban compost. Among all, vermicompost is widely used one in which earthworms are used to decompose the organic wastes. The feaces of the earthworms is rich in nutrients and growth promoters.2

Table 3: Physico-chemical properties of vermicompost and vermiwash.

Parameter Vermicompost Vermiwash
pH 6.12 7.11
Calcium (mg kg-1) 322.33 192.4
Magnesium (mg kg-1) 137.33 102.53
Manganese (mg kg-1) 0.69 0.40
Iron (mg kg-1) 0.21 0.11
Copper (mg kg-1) 0.09 0.05
Zinc (mg kg-1) 1.13 0.43

(Abdullah and Kumar, 2010)

The liquid extract obtained through earthworm worked soil is referred to as Vermiwash and it contains all the secondary and micronutrients as that of vermicompost but in lesser quantities comparatively2.

Table 4: Soil chemical analysis after harvest and yield of okra.

Treatments Increase in OC % Increase in Ca (ppm) Increase in Mg (ppm) Increase in Zn (ppm) Fruit yield (g/plant)
Control -0.07 -2.45 -0.39 -1.50 24.69
Cattle dung @ 100 g/plant 0.27 1.79 0.73 5.12 31.64
Chemical fertilizers -0.15 1.15 0.35 0.86 75.43
Vermiwash @ 100 ml/plant 0.14 3.40 0.64 6.73 30.36
Vermicompost @ 100 g/plant 0.64 4.07 0.90 10.24 59.04
Vermicompost and Vermiwash 0.73 5.00 1.00 15.62 69.11

(Abdullah and Kumar, 2010)

Combined application of vermicompost at 100 g/plant at the time of sowing and spraying of Vermiwash at 100 ml/plant recorded higher fruit yield per plant compared to vermicompost and vermiwash alone. The higher yield is mainly due to the supply of more amounts of secondary and micronutrients. The vermiwash and vermicompost combination was also found to have a significant influence on the biochemical characteristics of the soil with marked improvement in soil nutrients like calcium, magnesium and zinc.2

3. Oil cakes are the left over solid portion of seed after extraction of oil from the seed. Mostly, edible oil seed cakes are used as poultry and animal feed and non-edible oil seed cakes are used as concentrated manure.

Table 5: Composition of different oil cakes.

Constituents Castor cake Pongamia cake Jatropha cake
Fe (mg/g) 138.3 53.4 134.4
Mn (mg/g) 102.3 294.0 256.5
Zn (mg/g) 244.8 275.3 378.2
Cu (mg/g) 184.3 127.3 103.3
 C:N ratio 9.4:1 10.4:1 12.5:1
 OC % 48.84 46.72 50.65

(Anon., 2010)

Oil cake obtained from castor is a good source of iron and copper. Whereas oil cake obtained from Pongamia is a good source of manganese and jatropha contains more of zinc along with other micronutrients.5

Figure 1 Figure 1: Cotton yield as influenced by the application of Pongamia cake.

Click here to View Figure

 

Application of Pongamia oil cake at 100 % N equivalent dose recorded significantly highest cotton yield (1790 kg/ha) compared to 100 % inorganic fertilizer (1065 kg/ha) and farmers practice (950 kg/ha) which doesn’t have any source of secondary and micronutrients. One of the major constraints in cotton production is secondary (magnesium) and micronutrient deficiencies. Pongamia oil cake under the study contains 0.25 % Ca, 0.17 % Mg, 1.89 % S, 59 ppm Zn, 100 ppm Fe, 22 ppm Cu, 74 ppm Mn and 19 ppm B along with primary nutrients N (4.28 %), P2O5 (0.4 %) and K2O (0.74 %). Due to the correction of nutrient deficiencies and a balanced supply of all nutrients Pongamia treatment recorded the highest yield.16

4. Liquid organic manures is organic matter in liquid form, mostly derived from animal faeces, which can be used as organic fertilizer in agriculture. The most commonly used liquid organic manures in nowadays are,

Jeevamrutha

It is prepared by mixing cow dung, cow urine, pulse flour, jaggery, and bund soil in a ratio of 10:10:2:2:1 in 200 L of water. It is for soil application.

Panchagavya

It consists of a total of nine products viz. cow dung, cow urine, milk, curd, ghee, jaggery, banana, tender coconut and water. When suitably mixed and used, these have miraculous effects. It is for foliar application.

Beejamrutha

It is prepared by soaking 5 kg of cow dung bagged in a cloth bag in 20 L of water containing 50 g of lime overnight followed by squeezing the cow dung into the solution and adding 5 L of cow urine. Beejamrutha is for seed treatment only.

BDLM (Bio Digested Liquid Manure)

Thirty-kilogram green biomass of selected plant biomass, 15 kg cow dung, 20L cow urine were taken in separate 200 L cylindrical cement tanks, and 100 L water was added to each tank. The contents were incubated for 45 days. During the period the contents were digested by the microorganism present in cow dung.

Vermiwash

The liquid extract obtained through earthworm worked the soil is referred to as Vermiwash. It contains all nutrients as vermicompost but in relatively lesser quantities. Some other liquid organic manures used under organic farming are: Leaf extracts, Amruthjal, Liquid fish and bone meal, Sea weed extract

Table 6: Nutrient and microbial status of different liquid organic manures.

Parameter Panchagavya Beejamrutha Jeevamrutha
pH 6.82 8.20 7.07
EC (dS/m) 1.88 5.50 3.40
Total Zinc (mg kg-1) 1.27 2.96 4.29
Total Copper(mg kg-1) 0.38 0.52 1.58
Total Iron(mg kg-1) 29.71 15.35 282
Total manganese (mg kg-1) 1.84 3.32 10.7
Bacteria (cfu/ml) 26.10×105 15.40×105 19.70×105
Fungi (cfu/ml) 18.0×103 10.50×103 13.40×103
Actinomycetes (cfu/ml) 4.20×103 6.80×103 3.50×103

(Nileemas and Sreenivasa, 2011)

The various types of organic solutions prepared from plant and animal origin are effective in the promotion of growth and development in plants. The Panchagavya is an efficient plant growth stimulant that enhances the biological efficiency of crops. It is used to activate biological reactions in the soil and to protect the plants from disease incidence. Jeevamrutha promotes immense biological activity in the soil and enhances nutrient availability to crop. Beejamrutha protects the crop from soil borne and seed borne pathogens and also improves seed germination. All the three organic solutions contain significant amounts of micronutrients as well as microbial population (bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes).15

Table 7: Effect of liquid organic manures on the yield parameters of tomato.

Treatments No. of fruits/plant Fruit weight (g/plant)
RDF 11.12 167.23
Panchagavya only 16.12 216.60
Jeevamrutha only 11.87 149.43
Beejamrutha only 8.62 147.51
Beejamrutha + Jeevamrutha + Panchagavya 19.65 271.53
S.Em± 0.55 6.00
C.D.(p=0.05) 1.57 17.00

(Nileemas and Sreenivasa, 2011)

Note: RDF: 150-100-60 kg N-P-K/haand 25 t FYM/ha, Panchagavya (3%) @ 25, 70 & 100 DAS, Jeevamrutha @ 500 L/ha

The treatment combination of Beejamrutha+Jeevamrutha+Panchagavya recorded significantly the highest number of fruits per plant and fruit weight per plant compared to individual treatments and RDF. All the liquid organic manures contain significant amounts of micronutrients and the combination treatment has supplied a higher amount of micronutrients which resulted in higher fruits and fruit weight per plant.15

Table 8: Nutrient concentration in bio-digested liquid manures of different green biomass (locally available) and EBDLM.

Types of BDLM pH EC (dS/m) N(%) P(%) K(%) Ca(%) Mg(%) S(%) Fe (ppm) Zn (ppm) Cu (ppm) Mn (ppm)
Parthenium 7.94 0.04 0.76 0.17 0.29 0.13 0.05 0.26 17.4 2.18 1.92 3.6
Lantana 7.23 0.04 0.83 0.20 0.31 0.09 0.06 0.28 14.3 1.91 1.41 2.59
Calatropis 6.41 0.15 0.87 0.23 0.35 0.07 0.03 0.31 22.3 1.99 1.84 4.78
Subabul 7.84 0.05 0.86 0.18 0.33 0.10 0.04 0.23 18.3 1.36 1.16 2.07
Glyricidia 6.45 0.06 0.98 0.22 0.36 0.07 0.05 0.32 19.4 1.92 1.96 3.96
Neem 7.11 0.08 0.61 0.24 0.32 0.08 0.05 0.25 18.5 2.06 2.58 3.98
Pongamia 7.91 0.27 0.81 0.22 0.26 0.09 0.04 0.27 22.4 1.80 2.45 3.83
Jatropha 7.10 0.04 1.04 0.25 0.38 0.08 0.05 0.31 24.5 1.87 1.76 2.19
EBDLM (Pongamia) 8.10 0.26 1.29 0.39 0.57 0.17 0.08 0.35 28.7 3.68 3.66 7.74

(Anand, 2017)

The nutrient content available in the bio-digested liquid manure depends on the source of green biomass used for its preparation. When compared to BDLM, the enriched bio-digested liquid manure contains more amounts of all the nutrients. This is because enriching is usually done with oil cakes which are very good sources of plant nutrients and moreover they are concentrated organic manures.3

Table 9: Pod yield, haulm yield, oil yield and B:C ratio of groundnut as influenced by the different liquid organic manures.

Treatment Pod yield (kg/ha) Haulm yield (kg/ha) Oil yield (kg/ha) B:C ratio
BDLM @ 25 kg N equivalent per ha + 3 sprays of Panchagavya at 3 % 1783 2767 554 2.3
BDLM @ 25 kg N equivalent per ha + 3 sprays of vermiwash at 3 % 1752 2589 538 2.2
EBDLM @ 25 kg N equivalent per ha + 3 sprays of Panchagavya at 3 % 2023 3090 668 2.7
EBDLM @ 25 kg N equivalent per ha + 3 sprays of vermiwash at 3 % 1879 2794 596 2.4
Control (25-50-25 Kg N-P2O5-K2O/ha) 1625 2518 482 1.8
C. D. at 5 % 186 303 61

(Shashidara, 2014)

All the organic treatments recorded significantly higher yields and B:C ratio compared to control i.e., RDF which doesn’t have any secondary and micronutrients. Application of enriched bio digested liquid manure at 25 kg N equivalent per ha + 3 sprays of Panchagavya at 3 % recorded highest pod yield, haulm yield, oil yield and B:C ratio compared to other treatments. This is mainly because EBDLM(Enriched Bio Digested Liquid Manure) and Panchagavya contain more secondary and micronutrients than BDLM and vermiwash.21

Leaf extracts

Table 10: Secondary nutrient content in different sources.

Source of nutrient Ca (%) Mg (%)
Neem leaf extract 0.77 0.75
Poultry manure 0.32 0.41
Wood ash extract 15.00 1.00
Modified neem leaf extract 15.66 1.53

(Emmanuel, 2012)

Table 11: Yield and soil chemical composition after harvesting of maize + watermelon intercropping under different fertilizer treatments.

Treatments Yield (kg/plot) Soil status after harvesting of the crop
Maize Watermelon pH OM % Ca (mmol/kg ) Mg (mmol/kg )
Neem leaf extract @3 L/25 m2 1.65b 20.3bc 6.25d 1.44b 1.00b 1.00b
Poultry manure @ 15 kg /25m2 1.70b 16.75b 6.10c 1.66e 1.25c 0.84d
Wood ash extract @3 L/25 m2 3.00d 10.4a 6.80f 1.51bd 1.29d 0.78c
Modified neem leaf extract @ 3 L/25 m2 3.85e 28.8d 6.34d 1.74f 1.31e 0.88e
NPK 15-15-15 @ 300g/25m2 2.15c 23.8c 5.38ab 0.38b 0.06a 0.06a
Control 1.20a 7.8a 5.2a 0.28a 0.03a 0.07a

(Emmanuel, 2012)

Note: Initial- pH: 5.45;  OM: 0.69;  Ca: 0.11;  Mg: 0.09

Modified neem leaf extract (1200 L/ha) gave significantly higher yields in both maize and watermelon (sole and intercrop) compared to NPK. The modified neem leaf extract also improved soil parameters like pH, organic matter, calcium and magnesium after the harvest. NPK treatment recorded lower yields as well as poor soil parameters like pH, organic matter, calcium and magnesium after the harvest as chemical fertilizers contains no source of other nutrients.8

5. Biofertilizers is a substance which contains living microorganisms which, when applied to seeds, plant surfaces, or soil, colonize the rhizosphere or the interior of the plant and promotes growth by increasing the supply or availability of nutrients to the host plant.23

Though many biofertilizers are identified and used regularly, most of them are specific for primary nutrients. The work on secondary and micronutrient solubilizing or mobilizing microorganisms is meager. Some of the microorganisms identified in increasing the availability of secondary and micronutrients are: S- Thiobacillussulfoxidans, Beggiota, Fe- Thiobacillusferroxidans, Ferrobacillusferroxidans, Zn- Bacillus spp.

Table 12: Mineral profile of Azollapinnata.

Minerals Content Minerals Content
Copper (ppm) 9.1 Calcium (%) 1.64
Boron (ppm) 31 Iron (ppm) 1569
Cobalt (ppm) 8.11 Zinc (ppm) 325
Nickel (ppm) 5.33 Manganese (ppm) 2418

(Anitha et al., 2016)

Azolla, a floating fern which is commonly used in rice fields along with fixing atmospheric nitrogen also supplies secondary and micronutrients like Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, B, Co and Ni.4

Table 13: Effect of microbial inoculation on the availability of P, micronutrients and yield of faba bean.

Treatments Soil nutrient content after harvest Yield (t/fed) % increase over control
P Fe Mn Zn Cu
Control 3.71 3.55 0.67 0.28 0.24 2.62
VAM 8.44 4.22 0.84 0.61 0.30 2.97 12.03
PDB 6.15 3.75 0.70 0.39 0.28 2.85 7.14
VAM+PDB 8.93 5.43 1.00 0.79 0.53 3.09 16.16
L.S.D. at 0.05 1.30 0.30 0.29 0.09 0.20 0.30

(Raafat and Tharwat, 2006)

 Note: VAM: Vascular Arbuscular Mycorrhizae PDB: Phosphorus Dissolving Bacteria

1 fed = 0.42 ha

Initial soil status: P- 3.9 %;  Fe- 3.72;  Mn -0.66;  Zn – 0.29;  Cu- 0.21

Higher values of P, Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu uptake, were observed by inoculation with VAM + PDB, while inoculation by VAM or PDB solely recorded relatively lesser values. Due to the higher availability of micronutrients in VAM + PDB, it recorded the highest yield as well as the highest per cent increase over control (16.6 %). VAM is more efficient in increasing nutrient availability than PSB. VAM (Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizae) is associated with the rots of plants and increases the total volume of roots which in turn increases the volume of soil in contact with roots. As a result, the micronutrients which are less mobile in the soil is made available to plant by these vesicular extensions.17

Animal Manures

The most commonly used animal manures are poultry manure and goat manure in India. Horse manure and swine manure are also in use in foreign countries.

Table 14: Effect of organic manure and gypsum on yield and nutrient uptake of groundnut.

Treatment Groundnut yield (q/ha) Nutrient uptake (kg/ha)
Pod Haulm Ca Mg S
Organic manure
Control 16.2 29.5 44.2 27.2 12.2
FYM 10 t/ha 18.5 32.2 51.2 30.9 14.0
Poultry manure(PM) 5 t/ha 18.1 32.0 51.5 30.5 13.7
CD (P=0.05) 0.73 1.17 1.78 1.13 0.42
Gypsum (250 kg/ha)
Control 16.6 30.5 45.8 28.1 12.5
Full at sowing 18.1 31.6 50.1 30.2 13.6
Half at sowing + half at 35 DAS 18.1 31.6 50.9 30.4 13.8
CD (P=0.05) 0.51 0.78 1.27 0.82 0.30

(Rao and Shaktawat, 2005 )

Note: FYM: Ca-0.24%; S-0.06%PM: Ca-1.1 %;S-0.1% Gypsum:Ca-18%;S-14%

Application of farmyard manure at 10 t/ha, poultry manure at 5 t/ha and gypsum at 250 kg/ha increased total uptake of all secondary nutrients and thereby pod and haulm yield of groundnut compared to control. The increase in uptake of nutrients and yield is mainly due to the supply of nutrients by the organic manures and gypsum. Poultry manure at 5 t/ha is as effective as that of farmyard manure at 10 t/ha. Irrespective of the time of application, gypsum significantly increased the nutrient uptake and yield of groundnut and there is no significant difference whether gypsum is applied at the time of sowing or half at the time of sowing and a half at 35 DAS.18

Utilization of poultry manure has been a common practice in India. Poultry manure is rich organic manure since solid and liquid excreta are excreted together resulting in no urine loss. In deep litter manure, the litter absorbs moisture and helps keep the manure friable. Litter is not used when the birds are reared in cages so the manure obtained in cage system is more concentrated. Lower C: N ratio, higher nutrients like sulfur, iron, zinc, copper and manganese were recorded in cage poultry manure.20

Table 15: Effect of different poultry manures on protein and oil content of mustard.

Treatments Protein content (%) Increase over control (%) Oil content (%) Increase over control (%)
Control 21.25 40.25
DLS-PM @10 t/ha 22.42 5.22 41.41 2.80
DLS-PM @20 t/ha 23.78 10.64 42.35 4.96
CS-PM @10 t/ha 23.75 10.53 43.71 7.92
CS-PM @20 t/ha 24.31 12.59 44.11 8.75
LSD (0.05) 1.43 2.69

(Mohamed et al., 2010)

Application of cage system poultry manure (CS-PM) at 10 t/ha recorded higher protein content and oil content in mustard and is on par with cage system and deep litter system poultry manure (DLS-PM) at higher rates i.e., at 20 t/ha. Higher protein and oil content is mainly due to the supply of secondary and micronutrients. Lowest protein and oil content was recorded in control due to no supply of nutrients.13

Organically approved amendments

Table 16: Organically approved and permitted sources as secondary and micronutrient.

Source
Matter produced on an organic farm unit
Farmyard and poultry manure, slurry, urine, Composts, Vermicompost, Crop residues, green manure, Straw and other mulches
Traps, barriers and repellants
Physical methods (e.g. chromatic traps, mechanical traps), Mulches, nets, Pheromones – in traps and dispensers only
Mineral Origin
Clay (bentonite, perlite, vermiculite, zeolite) and Diatomaceous earth, Calcified sea weed, Basic slag, Lime, Limestone, Gypsum and Calcium chloride, Kieserite, Epsum salt, Natural phosphates (like rock phosphate), Sulphur (elemental) and Boudreaux mixture
Plant, Animal and Microbiological origin
Bacterial preparations (biofertilizers), Biodynamic preparations, Plant preparations and botanical extracts, Plant-based repellents (Neem preparations from Azadirachtaindica), Algal preparations (gelatin), Casein, Extracts from mushroom, chlorella, fermented products from Aspergillus, Beeswax, Natural acids (vinegar), plant oils, Quassia.
Others: Carbon dioxide, nitrogen gas, Soft soap, soda, sulphur dioxide, Homeopathic, ayurvedic preparations, Herbal and biodynamic preparations, Sea salt and salty water

(Yadav, 2011)

Even though there is a strict restriction in the use of fertilizers in organic farming, IFOAM, Germany has allowed the use of some of the chemical fertilizers as amendments (which are mostly of naturally occurring substances) and they were shown in the above table with their respective secondary and micronutrient contents.23

Some of the substances are allowed with some restrictions like the substances should be free from heavy metals and other pollutants.

Cropping system management

Crop rotation is the backbone of organic farming practices and is a must to keep the soil healthy and to allow the natural microbial systems working. Crop rotation is the succession of different crops cultivated on the same land. Follow 3-4 years rotation plan. All high nutrient-demanding crops should precede and follow legumes dominated crop combination and returned back to the soil. Rotation of pest host and non-pest host crops helps in controlling soil-borne diseases and pest. It also helps in controlling weeds. It is better for improving productivity and fertility of the soil. Crop rotations help in improving soil structure through different types of the root system. Legumes should be used frequently in rotation with cereal and vegetable crops. Green manure crops should also find a place in planning rotations. Some important benefits of crop rotations are: a). Not all plants have the same nutritive needs.b). Soil structure is improved through different types of roots and the addition of organic matter.c). Rotations help against the buildup of weeds, insects and pathogens.

Green manuring is the growing of a crop for the thespecific purpose of incorporating it into the soil while green, or soon after maturity with a view to improving the soil and benefiting subsequent crops. Green manuring helps increasing organic matter and nutrient content of the soil, maintain and improve soil structure, reduce the loss of nutrients and soil loss by erosion. There are two types of green manuring: I. Green manuring in situ: In this system, green manure crops are grown and buried in the same field which is to be green-manured, either as a pure crop or as an intercrop with the main crop. This is the most common green manure crops grown under this system are sunhemp (Crotalariajuncea), dhaincha (Sesbaniaaculeata), pillipesera (Phaseolus trilobus) and guar (Cyamopsistetragonaloba)II. Green leaf manuring: refers to turning into the soil green leaves and tender twigs collected from shrubs and trees grown on bunds, waste lands and nearby forest areas. The common shrubs and trees used are Glyricidia, Sesbania, Karanj etc.

Table 17: Mineral composition of eupatorium on dry weight basis.

Constituent (unit) Value Constituent (unit) Value
Organic carbon (%) 1.87 Sulphur (mg/kg) 390.4
Nitrogen (%) 1.05 Iron (ppm) 500.3
Phosphorus (%) 0.11 Copper (ppm) 19.3
Potassium (%) 1.50 Zinc (ppm) 330.5
Calcium (mg/kg) 470.3 Manganese (ppm) 115.6
Magnesium (mg/kg) 320.0 Boron (ppm) 4.00

(De et al., 2008)

Eupatorium (Chromoleanaodorata) an obnoxious weed found in abundance in India has become a menace in younger plantations, waste lands and along road sides. This weed is also known to cause diseases in animals and human beings. Considering its adverse impact on the environment, several attempts have been made to control this weed by adopting various methods. But, none of the methods showed great promise in controlling this weed. Under this juncture, few efforts were made to find out alternate ways for controlling/minimizing this weed menace. One of the environmentally friendly ways to eradicate this weed would be its utilization for productive purposes in agriculture. One of the ways of using eupatorium is as green leaf manure before its seed setting. Further, the nutrient (secondary and micronutrient) content of Eupatorium is quite comparable to other conventional green manure crops like sunn hemp and Glyricidia.7

Table 18: Effect of eupatorium on grain, straw yield and B:C ratio of rice.

Treatment Grain yield (kg ha-1) Straw yield (kg ha-1) B:C ratio
No eupatorium 5707 4650 2.8
Eupatorium @ 5t/ha 6120 5227 2.9
Eupatorium @ 10t/ha 6735 6206 3.18
Eupatorium @ 15t/ha 6915 6130 3.13
Eupatorium @ 20t/ha 6929 6862 3.08
C.D. at 5% 315 505

(Manjappa, 2014)

Green leaf manuring with eupatorium, an alien obnoxious weed at 10 t/ha recorded significantly higher rice grain (6735 kg/ha) and straw yield (6206 kg/ha) along with highest B:C ratio (3.18) due to supply of all plant nutrients including secondary and micronutrients compared to control (5707 kg/ha, 4650 kg/ha & 2.8, respectively).12

Crop residues is the portion of a plant or crop left in the field after harvest, or that part of the crop that is not used domestically or sold commercially. The total amount of residue produced in India – 350 m t/yr.

Crop residue management: It is the use of the non-commercial portion of the plant or crop for protection or improvement of the soil. Management of crop residues as a source of nutrients in organic farming is done by Residue incorporation, Surface retention and mulching, Composting.

Table 19: Chemical properties of rice straw.

Constituent (unit) Value Constituent (unit) Value
Organic carbon (%) 1.87 Sulphur (mg/ha) 390.4
Nitrogen (%) 1.05 Iron (ppm) 500.3
Phosphorus (%) 0.11 Copper (ppm) 19.3
Potassium (%) 1.50 Zinc (ppm) 330.5
Calcium (mg/ha) 470.3 Manganese (ppm) 115.6
Magnesium (mg/ha) 320.0 Boron (ppm) 4.0

(Abdul et al., 2016)

Rice straw organic carbon concentration (1.87%) was moderate. Straw was rich in phosphorus, calcium, magnesium and sulphur (1170, 470, 320 and 390 mg/ha, respectively), as well as iron and zinc (500 and 330.5 ppm, respectively). Other mineral elements such as boron, manganese, copper and sodium are in relatively lower concentrations.1

Table 20: Groundnut yield as influenced by ground rice straw (GRS).

Treatment Seed yield (kg/ha) OM (%) Nutrient content of the soil after harvest (ppm)
Ca (meq) Mg (meq) S Fe Mn Cu B Mo Zn
Control 650 c 5.2 b 2.5 1.2 10 4.3 6.0 0.13 0.24 0.23 0.15
GRS @1.25 t/ha 1278 a 5.8 a 2.4 1.0 15.5 8.2 8.0 0.19 0.34 0.12 0.50
GRS @2.5 t/ha 976 b 6.0 a 2.6 1.1 16.7 7.4 7.6 0.18 0.28 0.13 0.31

(Abdul et al., 2016)

Application of rice straw at 1.25 t/ha after grounding into small pieces of 2-5 cm recorded significantly higher yield along with improving the organic matter, secondary and micronutrient content of the soil. The decrease in the growth traits at the higher application of rice straw might be due to the high dose of rice straw, which apparently takes more time to decompose for release of nutrients. The results suggest that the use of rice straw at lower application rates could be considered as optimum for groundnut production. Its use could also limit environmental pollution arising from the burning of rice straw.1

Table 21: Secondary and micronutrient content in different crops.

Crop Ca (%) Mg (%) S (%) Fe (ppm) Mn (ppm) Zn (ppm) Cu (ppm) B (ppm) Mo (ppm)
Rice 1.2-1.4 0.2-0.3 0.2-0.4 70-150 150-500 18-50 8-25 6-7
Wheat 0.2-0.1 0.16-1.0 0.1-0.3 10-300 16-200 21-70 5-50
Maize 0.3-0.7 0.15-0.45 0.15-0.5 50-250 20-300 20-60 5-20 5-25
Sorghum 0.3-0.6 0.1-0.2 0.1-0.3 65-100 10-190 15-30 2-7 1-10
Barley 0.3-1.2 0.15-0.5 0.15-0.4 40-250 25-100 15-70 5-25 0.1-0.2
Sugarcane 0.2-0.5 0.1-0.35 0.1-0.3 40-250 25-400 20-100 5-15 4-30 0.05-0.4
Soybean 0.36-2.0 0.26-1.0 0.21-0.4 51-350 21-100 21-50 10-30 21-55 0.1-0.5
Mustard 1.0-2.5 0.25-0.75 0.3-0.75 70-300 25-200 34-200 5-15 30-100 0.1-0.4

(Tandon, 2013)

Plants differ in their ability to uptake and accumulate nutrients in their plant tissues. Legume plants have a capability to accumulate more amounts of molybdenum than other plants as molybdenum is a component of nitrogenase enzyme which is responsible for nitrogen fixation. Similarly, oil seed crops will accumulate more amounts of sulphur than other crop plants as sulphur is essential for oil synthesis.21

Conclusion

The birthright of all living things is good health. This law is true for soil, plant, animal and man: the health of these four is one connected chain. Any weakness or defect in the health of any earlier link is passed on to the next and succeeding link until it reaches the last, namely, the man. Therefore, to produce quality food and to sustain the environment organic agriculture plays a crucial role and organic management practices like application of FYM, compost, oil cakes, liquid organic manures, biofertilizers, vermicompost, organically approved amendments, cropping system management viz., green manuring, crop rotation, intercropping, crop residues management found beneficial for sustaining soil health in terms of build-up of secondary and micronutrients and safeguarding the environmental degradation. Effective management and recycling of available on-farm wastes helps to reduce the dependency on external chemical inputs and limits the environmental pollution arising out of burning of farm wastes.

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the University of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru for carrying research on organic farming during the Ph. D program and support for the project.

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdul A. A., Bolaji U. Olayinka. and Emmanuel O. Etejere, 2016, Rice straw: a valuable organic manure for soil amendment in the cultivation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea), Env. Exp. Bio., 14: 205–211.
    CrossRef
  2. Abdullah A. A., and Kumar Sukhraj, 2010, Effect of vermiwash and vermicompost on soil parameters and productivity of okra (Abelmoschusesculentus) in guyana. African J. Agri. Res., 5 (14): 1794-1798.
  3. Anand M. R., 2017, Standardization of organic crop production technologies for groundnut (Arachis hypogaeaL.) – finger millet (Eleusinecoracana(L.) Gaertn.) cropping system in the eastern dry zone of Karnataka. Ph. D. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore.
  4. Anitha K. C., Rajeshwari Y. B., Prasanna S. B. And Shilpa Shree, J., 2016, Nutritive evaluation of azolla as livestock feed. J. Exp. Bio. Agri. Sci., 4 (6): 671-674.
    CrossRef
  5. Anonymous, 2010, Annual Rep., Regional Centre of Organic Farming, Hebbal.
  6. Anonymous, 2012, Fundamentals of Soil Science, Indian Society of Soil Science, New Delhi.
  7. De G. C., Mukhopadhyaya S. K., and Jayaram D., 2008, Mineral composition of important weeds of lateritic belt of West Bengal. Indian J. Weed Sci., 20 (1): 68-73.
  8. Emmanuel Ibukunoluwa Moyin-Jesu, 2012, Comparative evaluation of modified neem leaf, neem leaf and wood ash extracts on soil fertility improvement, growth and yields of maize (Zea mays L.) and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) (sole and intercrop) Agri. Sci., 3 (1): 90-97.
    CrossRef
  9. FiBL and IFOAM, 2018, The World of Organic Agriculture statistics and emerging trends.
  10. International Federation for Organic Agriculture Movements (Ifoam), 2008, Building Sustainable Organic Sectors. http//www.ifoam.org.
  11. Kotha Sami Reddy, Muneshwar Singh, Anand Swarup. Annangi Subba Rao And Kamlesh Narain Singh, 2002, Sulfur mineralization in two soils amended with organic manures, crop residues and green manures. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 8: 167-171.
    CrossRef
  12. Manjappa K., 2014, Utilization of eupatorium (Chromoleanaodorata), an obnoxious weed as green leaf manure in enhancing rice productivity. J. Agri. Veter. Sci., 7 (10): 46-48.
    CrossRef
  13. Mohmed M. Amanullah, Sekar S. And Muthukrishnan P., 2010, Prospects and potential of poultry manure. Asian j. plant Sci., 9 (4): 172-182.
    CrossRef
  14. Naveen Kumar, A, T., 2009, Effect of FYM and bio digested liquid manure on growth and yield of groundnut under rainfed condition, M. Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore.
  15. Nileema S. Gore and Sreenivasa M. N., 2011, Influence of liquid organic manures on growth, nutrient content and yield of tomato (LycopersiconesculentumMill.) in the sterilized soil.Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 24 (2): 153-157.
  16. Osman M., Wani S. P., Balloli S. S., Sreedevi T. K., Srinivasa Rao, Ch. and Emmanuel Dsilva, 2009, Pongamia seed cake as a valuable source of plant nutrients for sustainable agriculture. Ind. J. Fert.,5 (2):25-32.
  17. Raafat N. Z. And Tharwat E. E. R., 2006, Impact of microorganism’s activity on phosphorus availability and its uptake by faba bean plants grown on some newly reclaimed soils in Egypt. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 8 (2):221-225.
  18. Rao S. S. And Shaktawat M. S., 2005, Effect of organic manure, phosphorus and gypsum on nutrient uptake in groundnut. Agropedology, 15 (2): 100-106.
  19. Roychowdhury Rajib, Banerjee U., Sofkova S. And Tah J., 2013, Organic farming for crop improvement and sustainable agriculture in the era of climatechange. J. Bio. Sci., 13 (2): 50-65.
    CrossRef
  20. Seenappa C., Kalyana Murthy, K. N., Anand M. R. And Vikramarjun M., 2019, Handbook of soil, water and plant analysis. UAS (B).
  21. Shashidara, 2014, Development and evaluation of organic production package for table purpose groundnut varieties in dry zones of Karnataka. Ph. D (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Bangalore.
  22. Tandon H. L. S., 2013, Micronutrient handbook. Fertilizer development and consultation organization, New Delhi, India.
  23. Yadav A. K., 2011, Organic Agriculture (Concept, Scenario, Principals and Practices), National Centre of Organic Farming, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Govt of India,Ghaziabad.
scroll to top