MenuMenu

  1. Home
  2. Volume 6, Number 1
  3. Effect of Pre-Harvest Gibberellic Acid and Calcium Application on Post-Harvest Behaviour of Subtropical Peaches

Effect of Pre-Harvest Gibberellic Acid and Calcium Application on Post-Harvest Behaviour of Subtropical Peaches

Shashi K. Sharma1, Preet Pratima2

1Department of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture and Forestry, Neri, Hamirpur (HP) India – 177001

2Department of Fruit Science College of Horticulture, Dr Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (HP) India -173230

Corresponding author Email: shashi_uhf@yahoo.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.6.1.10

Article Publishing History

Received: 18/09/2017
Accepted: 04/02/2018
Published Online: 06-02-2018

Review Details

Plagiarism Check: Yes
Reviewed by: Dr. Shivendu Pratap Singh Solanki
Final Approval by: Dr. Dawn C.P. Ambrose

Article Metrics

Views     PDF Download PDF Downloads: 1654

Google Scholar

Abstract:

Shorter shelf life and faster deterioration of fruits after harvest are the major constraints with the peach production in the subtropical regions. Pre-harvest application of GA3 and chloride & nitrate of calcium were tried in a RBD experiment for enhancing peach fruit quality and reducing fruit deterioration during shelf life studies of five subtropical peach cultivars. At harvest fruit quality parameters viz. TSS, acidity, firmness etc. were influenced greatly by the treatments. Other physical properties of the fruit such as fruit weight, size and yield were not influenced much. Physiological weight loss during storage and the deterioration of other fruit characteristics were considerably lowered by calcium treatments. Foliar application of Calcium nitrate (1%) was found to be superior over calcium chloride (2%) for improving fruit quality and shelf life.

Keywords:

Calcium; Gibberellins; Pre-harvest management; Post harvest life; Peach varieties; Plant hormones; Shelf life

Download this article as: 

Copy the following to cite this article:

Sharma S. K, Pratima P. Effect of Pre-Harvest Gibberellic Acid and Calcium Application on Post-Harvest Behaviour of Subtropical Peaches. Curr Agri Res 2018;6(1). doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.12944/CARJ.6.1.10

Copy the following to cite this URL:

Sharma S. K, Pratima P. Effect of Pre-Harvest Gibberellic Acid and Calcium Application on Post-Harvest Behaviour of Subtropical Peaches. Curr Agri Res 2018;6(1). Available from: http://www.agriculturejournal.org/?p=3437

Introduction

Peach is cultivated almost throughout the world and its production is about 24.97 million metric ton.22 It ranks next only to apple (89.33 million metric ton) and pear (27.35 million metric ton) amongst the temperate fruits in the world production level. Though it has originated in the temperate region of China, the peach has very well adapted to the subtropical regions also. Today there is a wide array of peach varieties which have low chilling requirement and therefore flower and fruit very well in the subtropics. But despite of the good production levels, the subtropical peaches have very low proportion in international and domestic trade due to the high perishability of the fruits after harvest. To tackle this problem, the grower generally restore to early harvest of the fruits when they are quite firm to withstand handling and transport. But it has been observed that the fruits so harvested, never reach their full flavor, aroma and consumer acceptance. Crisosto and Costa3 have reported that recently most potential peach producing countries have lost considerable market share due to excessive early harvesting. The post harvest quality of peaches is largely a function of fruit physiological maturity at the time of harvest. They (peaches and Nectarines) undergo a rapid softening after harvest, which leads to dramatic losses in the marketing chain, soft fruits are easily bruised during handling and more susceptible to decay.10 Therefore, it is necessary to pick them at early stage of ripening than at ‘on tree physiological maturity’. But, this practice has certainly some repercussions related to fruit firmness and shelf life. Therefore, in order to succeed in domestic and international markets it is imperative to work over the issues of senescence reduction and fruit firmness and shelf life improvement of peaches.

Plant nutritional status is an important factor of fruit quality and post harvest life potential. The nutrient, calcium is involved in numerous biochemical and morphological processes in plants and has been implicated in many physiological disorders of considerable economic importance to production and post harvest quality. It plays a special role in maintaining the cell wall structure in fruits and other storage organs by interacting with pectic acid in cell walls to form calcium pectate.17 The pre-harvest sufficiency of calcium determines the rate of deterioration of cellular membranes.12 Being poor in translocation of calcium to the plant terminals, it has been generally observed suboptimal in the maturing fruits and therefore the pre-harvest foliar application of this nutrient element has been found to be beneficial in influencing the shelf life and fruit quality in many fruits. Apart from calcium plant growth regulators like gibberellins being anti –senescent in nature are also used in some fruit species for having extended harvesting and marketing seasons of the fruits.2 Keeping in view the advantages of calcium and GA3 applications in other fruits experiment was conducted to find out the effect of different calcium sources and GA3 concentrations on the shelf life and storage behaviour of different low chill requiring peach cultivars.

Materials and Methods

The studies were carried out from 2013 to 2015 at the college of Horticulture and Forestry (Dr. Y. S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (HP), Neri, Hamirpur (HP) India. The experiment was set in the experimental orchard on low chilling peach varieties namely Pratap, Florda Prince, Early Grande, Prabhat, Shan-i-Punjab; which were planted during the year 2008 on wild peach rootstock and trained to a open vase system, planted in a alternate planting arrangement at a planting density of 1666 plant per hectare on sloppy terrain having soil pH 6.68 and organic carbon content 1.28% at the start of the experiment. The treatments consisted of two gibberellic acid (GA3) treatments – 50 and 100 ppm and two calcium sources: Calcium chloride (Cacl2)and Calcium nitrate (Ca(NO3)2), both applied at the rate of 1% and 2%. All the treatments were applied as foliar sprays one week prior to the expected physiological maturity. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with a control of water spray and 4 replications of each treatment. Since ground cover may influence the nutrition level of the plant therefore all the trees kept mulched with orchard sod on a two meter wide terrace. Other orchard management practices including spray of fungicide, insecticide, fertilizer application etc. all were kept similar for all the varieties under study.

Twenty fruits, of uniform size and maturity level, per tree were randomly collected across the periphery of the tree at harvest time. These fruits were analysed for various physico-chemical characteristics like fruit size, weight, firmness, total soluble solids (oBrix) and titrable acid content (meq of malic acid) as per standard procedure described by.1 The shelf life observations were taken by placing the harvested fruits at room temperature. Physiological weight loss of the fruits was measured as the percent reduction in fruit weight. All these parameters were recorded at 0, 3, 6 and 9 days after harvest. All the statistical analyses were carried out as per procedure described by Gupta and Gupta11 using SX statistical software.

Results and Discussion

The data pertaining to effect of GA3 and calcium treatments on fruit quality and yield are presented in table 1. It is evident from the data that the effect of all the treatments was found to be superior over the control as far as TSS, acidity and fruit firmness of different cultivars was concerned. Fruit size was influenced significantly incase of Early Grande and Shan-i- Punjab only. In other varieties no significant effect was obseved on fruit size. These findings were in close conformity with those of Farag et al.,8 who reported no significant effect of calcium treatments on fruit physical parametrs. Similarly fruit weight has only been influenced significantly in case of pratap cultivar. Different treatments have not influenced total yield in any of the cultivars studied. From these results it can be inferred that GA3 and calcium

Table 1: Effect of pre-harvest GA3 and calcium sprays on fruit physico-chemical characteristics and yield of different subtropical peach cultivars

Variety

Treatment

 Fruit wt. (g)        Fruit Size   TSS (0B) Acidity (%) Firmness (kg)
Length Diameter Yield
Chemical Dose (mm) (mm) (kg)
Pratap GA3 50ppm 69.0 60.2 63.5 53.0 13.3 0.61 7.04
100ppm 68.8 60.4 63.5 53.0 13.1 0.64 7.37
Ca(NO3)2 1% 67.0 60.3 63.9 52.6 13.6 0.72 7.41
2% 68.4 60.0 63.7 52.8 13.7 0.74 7.42
CaCl2 1% 71.6 60.2 63.2 53.6 13.0 0.67 7.45
2% 68.3 59.9 63.0 52.6 13.1 0.68 7.47
Control — 65.8 51.2 53.3 46.8 12.1 0.56 6.42
CD 5.65 NS NS NS 1.13 0.20 0.14
Florda Prince GA3 50ppm 65.2 61.3 65.5 52.8 14.2 0.67 6.81
100ppm 67.5 60.8 65.4 53.3 14.6 0.69 6.88
Ca(NO3)2 1% 60.8 60.1 64.9 51.1 14.8 0.69 7.12
2% 60.6 59.1 66.8 51.3 14.2 0.71 7.22
CaCl2 1% 65.4 59.4 63.6 51.8 14.2 0.64 6.89
2% 62.0 57.1 61.3 49.6 14.2 0.69 6.92
Control — 60.4 54.3 56.5 47.1 12.2 0.58 6.22
CD NS NS NS NS 1.12 0.11 1.04
Early Grande GA3 50ppm 76.7 54.7 57.8 52.0 13.1 0.54 7.01
100ppm 77.4 56.1 59.5 53.1 13.4 0.68 7.39
Ca(NO3)2 1% 75.8 59.1 62.6 54.3 13.5 0.63 7.42
2% 72.3 58.8 62.0 53.1 13.2 0.68 7.50
CaCl2 1% 74.8 59.6 62.7 54.2 13.1 0.51 7.14
2% 74.4 61.2 65.1 55.2 13.9 0.52 7.43
Control — 73.3 55.1 57.0 51.0 11.9 0.49 7.00
CD NS 1.1 1.6 NS NS NS 0.31
Prabhat GA3 50ppm 59.9 58.4 62.5 49.7 14.1 0.59 6.05
100ppm 65.8 61.4 65.6 53.0 14.2 0.62 6.23
Ca(NO3)2 1% 59.5 57.0 61.9 49.1 14.9 0.61 6.28
2% 59.2 56.5 60.8 48.5 14.3 0.68 6.32
CaCl2 1% 56.5 54.7 59.0 46.8 14.3 0.63 6.21
2% 54.0 54.4 58.5 45.9 14.1 0.67 6.24
Control — 56.4 53.6 56.7 45.8 13.1 0.44 6.11
NS 1.1 1.2 2.5 1.1 0.23 1.24
Shan-i-Punjab GA3 50ppm 71.2 57.1 60.6 51.9 13.5 0.66 7.14
100ppm 74.5 52.5 55.7 50.2 13.2 0.68 7.23
Ca(NO3)2 1% 69.1 55.9 59.2 50.7 13.3 0.65 7.15
2% 72.9 56.3 59.7 51.9 13.4 0.71 7.31
CaCl2 1% 74.4 56.4 59.6 52.4 13.2 0.63 7.17
2% 74.2 56.4 59.9 52.4 13.5 0.68 7.24
Control — 69.3 54.9 57.0 49.8 12.1 0.54 6.60
NS 1.12 0.76 1.1 1.2 0.19 1.87

 

applications influenced only those fruit quality attributes which has certain correlation with fruit ripening processes which possess weak correlation with fruit ripening were raerly affected by gibberellin or calcium application 14 and 25. The positive influence on fruit size of Early Grande and Shan-i-Punjab culitvars may be attributed to the fact that these cultivars are a bit late in maturity in comparison to other cultivars studied hence, the treatment applications just at the fag end of maturity might have resulted into marginal increase in fruit size of other due cellular expansion due to growth stimulating hormones or substances. It has been therefore inferred that significant influence of GA3 and calcium applications was observed only in case of those varieties which have not attained their physiological maturity maxima. Sharma and Verma21 have studied the maturity pattern of different subtropical peaches and reported that the cultivars Early Grande and Shan-i-Punjab are comparatively late in maturity than other cultivars under subtropical conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Fruit yield has not seen influenced significantly by different treatments and this might have happended due to non significant effect of the treatments on the fruit physical parameters. Fruit ripening associated characteristics like TSS, acidity and firmness were influenced significantly by the application of different treatments. In most of the cultivars studied the highest TSS was recorded with calcium nitrate application. Calcium chloride ranked second and gibrrellic acid treatment was found to inluence TSS to the extent minimum. The higher doses reulted into higher TSS but, it was rarely found superior over the corresponding lower level of application. In case of Prabhat cultivar the effect of different treatments was found to be non -significant, may be due to the reason that it is a early maturing

cultivar21 and hence application of dfferent treatments could’nt influence this perticular fruit characteristic. Fruit acidity was also found to increase in the similar manner as the TSS increased with different chemical applications, highest value being recorded with calcium nitrate followed by calcium chloride and GA3 applications. The increase in the acid content with 2% application was not statistically different from 1%  application. Better results were obtained with calcium nitrate followed by calcium chloride and GA3 aaplication which may be attributed to the fact that calcium treatments might have delayed the ripening process by preserving the cell wall integrity and delayed pectic substances solubilization.15 Raja et al.,18 also observed delayed ripening with calcium chloride application in peach. Improved fruit quality attributes with calcium nitrate over calcium chloride may be supported with the views of Crisosto and Costa3 who explained that in peach fruit quality development the role of calcium application is not as important as that of nitrogen is. In peaches, the calcium mobility to the fruits is maintained throughout the fruit development period due to higher transpiration rates, if leaf calcium is under sufficiency. In addition to calcium, application of nitrogen in the form of calcium nitrate however might have results in better fruit quality development due to delayed fruit ripening and enhanced assimilation metabolism,7 apart from the above said advantages of calcium application. The effect of GA3 application on different fruit quality attributes was superior over control but comparatively lesser than the calcium treatments may e attributed to the fact that GA3 application is more effective when applied during early stages of fruit development. As the fruit advance toward maturity the influence of this hormone on fruit development fades away 6 and 20. Better fruit quality attributes obtained with calcium treatments may be attributed to the fact that calcium plays an important role in maintaining cell wall structure by interaction with pectic acid in the cell walls to form calcium pectate.5 Cell wall integrity is also preserved when de-esterified pectic acid residues form cross-bridges between negatively charged carboxylic groups and divalent cations such as calcium, thus minimizing pectic substance solubilization.15

Figure 1: Effect of pre-harvest GA3 and Calcium sprays on physiological wt. loss TSS and firmness of different peach cultivars during post-harvest shelf life Figure 1:  Effect of pre-harvest GA3 and Calcium sprays on physiological wt. loss TSS and firmness of different peach cultivars during post-harvest shelf life

Click here to View figure

 

After harvest, the fruit weight loss percent and the corresponding changes in TSS and fruit firmness has been presented in the Fig 1(a and b). With the increase in time after harvest there has been observed steady gain in weight loss percent of different peach cultivars studied. The loss observed under the control has been found to be considerably high than that observed under the different treatments applied. The slope of the curves of different treatments indicates that the rate of physiological weight loss was higher during first three days of observation and lower during the subsequent period of observation. In all most all the varieties studied the physiological weight loss of the fruits treated with GA3 weather 10 or 20 ppm was not statistically lower than the untreated control though the loss observed with different calcium treatments was considerably lower than control and GA3 treatments. T4 i.e.foliar application on of calcium nitrate 2% resulted into lowest phsysiological fruit weight percent in all the cultivars but statistically it has been found to be at par with 1% dose of this chemical. In some cases it was also at par with 2% calcium chloride treatment. Overall it has been inferred that T4 i.e. foliar application of 1% calcium nitrate resulted into best reduction in  phsysiological weight loss percent of the fruits of different peach varieties. In all the varieties studied except Prabhat there has been observed slight increase in the total soluble solids content upto 3 days after  harvest in case of untreated control but incase of treated fruits there was not observed such type of rise in TSS after harvest, thereafter there has been recorded sharp decline in the TSS of all the varieties studied. This indicates that GA3 and calcium treatments have supressed the after harvest climacteric rise and resulted into controled ripening process with decreased rate of TSS decline. In case of peaches this view has also been supported by a number of workers worldwide.4,13,16 Thomas et al.,24 noticed that gibberellins induce hydrolytic cell wall enzymes and enhance polysaccharide solubilization, favoring cell expansion. GA3 can also regulate genes involved in its own biosynthetic pathway or play a role in the protection of the endo-membrane system, and cell wall loosening14. In other cases, GA3 delays the onset of climacteric respiration2 and ripening cycle.9 Similar influence of calcium has also been demonstrated by.17,3,23

Conclusion

Fruit physico-chemical characteristics viz. TSS, acidity and firmness have been found to be influenced greatly by the pre-harvest sprays of GA3 and calcium. The rate of physiological weight loss and deterioration of other fruit characteristics like TSS and firmness was also reduced significantly by these treatments. The post harvest deterioration of fruit quality as found to be less in calcium treated samples than gibberellic acid treated ones. . Overall effect of 1% calcium nitrate foliar spray one week prior to expected physiological maturity has been found to be best treatment for maintaining fruit quality attributes and making long distance transportation of peaches, possible. Further, research on the impact of this treatment on nutritional status of the fruits may further strengthen the findings.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Rastriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (ICAR, GOI) for financially supporting the present studies

References

  1. A.O.A.C. Official Methods of Analysis of the Analytical Chemists, 13th ed. (W. Horowitz, ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC. 1980;1018.
  2. Ben-Arie R, Zhow, H. W, Sonego L, Zutkhi Y. Plant growth regulator effect on the storage and shelf life ‘Triumph’ persimmons. Acta Hort. (ISHS). 1997;436:243-250.
  3. Crisosto C. H, and  Costa G. Preharvest Factors Affecting Peach quality. In: The Peach: Botany, Production and Uses. Eds. D.R. Layne and D. Bassi. CAB International. 2008;536–549.
  4. Cassandro A, Drehmer V. T. D, Amanda M. F, Francielle D. Preharvest Spraying with gibberellic acid (GA3) and amino-ethoxyvinilglycine (AVG) delays fruit maturity and reduces fruit losses on peaches. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2005;27:1-5
  5. Conway W. S and Sams C. E. Possible mechanism by which post harvest calcium treatment reduces decay in apple.  Phytopathology. 1984;74:208-210
  6. Demirsoy L, Bilgener S. The effect of preharvest chemical applications on cracking and fruit quality in ‘0900 Ziraat’, ‘Lambert’ and ‘Van’ sweet cherry varieties. Acta Hort. (ISHS). 1998;468:663–670.
  7. Fallahi E. Preharvest nitrogen optimization for maximizing yield and postharvest fruit quality of apples. Acta Hort. (ISHS). 1997;448:415-420.
  8. Farag K, Ahmed M, Ahmed A. E, Ahmed S, Sabagh El. Effect of putrescine, gibberellic acid and calcium on quality characteristics and maturity delay of ‘Desert Red’ peach fruit cultivar. A: developmental aspects and physical properties of the fruit. J Agric & Env Sci. 2007;6:1-24.
  9. Ferri V. C, Rinaldi M. M, Silva J. A, Luchetta L, Marini L, Rombaldi C. V. Gibberellic acid on ripening delay of Kakis (Diospyrus kaki L.) cultivar Fuyu. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos. 2004;24:1–5.
  10. Forlani M, Basile B, Cirillo C, Iannini. Effect of harvest date and fruit position along the tree canopy on peach fruit quality. Acta Hort (ISHS). 2002;592:459-466:
  11. Gupta C. B and  Gupta V. An Introduction to Statistical Methods. Vikash Publishing House P. Ltd. New Delhi. 1995;781.
  12. Hocking B, Tyerman S. D, Burton R. A, Gilliham M. Fruit Calcium: Transport and Physiology. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:569
  13. Ju J, Pedersen-Lane, Maley F, and Chu E. Regulation of p53 Expression by Thymidylate Synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999;96:3769–3774.
  14. Kader A. A. Maturity, ripening, and quality relationships of fruit-vegetables. Acta Hort (ISHS). 1996;434:249-256.
  15. Krall S. M, McFeeters R. F. Pectin hydrolysis: Effect of temperature, degree of methylation, pH and calcium on hydrolysis rates.  J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998;46:1311-1315.
  16. Martinez-romero D. D, Valero M, Serrano F, Burlo A, Carbonell L. Exogenous poliamines and gibbrellic acid  effects on peach (Prunus persica l.) storability improvement. J. Food Sci. 2000;65:288-294.
  17. Poovaiah B. W. Role of calcium in prolonging storage life of fruits and vegetables. Food Technology. 1986;40:86-89
  18. Raja R. H. S, Bhat Z. A, Malik A. R, Shafi R. H. Interrelationship between fruit quality and pre-harvest calcium chloride treatment on peach Cv. ‘Shan-I-Punjab’. International J Agric Envir & Biotech. 2015;8:103-109
  19. Reddy A. R. G and Sarkar M. M. Studies on the effect of foliar application of calcium on postharvest, corm and cormel production in gladiolus CV. summer sunshine. International J Agric Envir & Biotech. 2016;9:89-94.
  20. Rokaya P, Baral D, Gautam D, Shrestha A, Paudyal K. Effect of Pre harvest application of Gibberellic Acid on Fruit Quality and Shelf Life of Mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Am J Plant Sci. 2016;7:1033-1039
  21. Sharma Shashi K and Verma K. S. Adaptation potential of low chill peach varieties to inter-annual climatic variability in the lower Shiwalik Himalayas.  International J Agric Envir & Biotech. 2014;7:157-164
  22. FAOSTAT. Production/quantities of peaches and nectarines. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visulize. 2016.
  23. Taylor K. C. and Brannen P. Effects of foliar calcium application on peach fruit quality, shelf-life, and fruit rot. Albion® Conference on Plant Nutrition. 2008;1-11.
  24. Thomas S. G, Rieu I and Steber C. M. Gibberellin metabolism and signaling. Vitamins & Hormones. 2005;72:289-338
  25. Zakharov, F. Fruit ripening and quality relationships. http://ucanr.edu/datastoreFiles/234-2807.pdf. 2015.

You may also like...

scroll to top