Introduction
The vegetables play a very important role in human nutrition as source of fibre, trace minerals, vitamins, carbohydrates and proteins and help to prevent various diseases resulting from malnutrition and unbalanced diet. Homegardens are intensively cultivated agroforestry systems managed within the compounds of individual homes.1 They supply a variety of nutritious food through provision of fresh and often pesticide free vegetables and fruits for healthy lives of the family members. Along with the nutritional benefits, homegardens provide potential food security to the house holder. Since the diverse mixture of crops is harvested at different times a constant supply of food in some form or the other is available from these homegardens throughout the year.2 In Kumaun Himalaya, vegetable production for commercial purpose has increased during last few years. In rural areas, there are some relatively small-scale producers who grow vegetables for the sale or exchange.
Women have made important contribution in almost every aspect of our society from the time immemorial.3,4 In rural area; women are major but largely unrecognized contributors to agricultural and economic productivity. They grow most of the family’s fruits and vegetables and participate in post harvest activities. However, the role of rural women in vegetable production has not widely been explored. Inadequate information on the level of women participation in agriculture and women’s substantial contribution in agriculture are neglected in policy issues.5,6 Therefore, in the present study, an attempt has been made to assess the contribution of rural women in cultivation of vegetables in homegarden agroforestry systems of Nainital district of Kumaun Himalaya, India. The main objectives were: i). to determine the extent of rural women participation; ii). to describe characteristics of rural women involved in vegetable cultivation and iii). To explore the relationship between the selected characteristics of rural women and their participation in vegetable cultivation in homegarden of Nainital district, Kumaun Himalaya, India.
Materials and Methods
Study Area
The study area selected for the present study was located in Kumaun Himalayan region of Uttarakhand state, India. The Kumaun Himalaya forms the northwestern part of the central Himalayan region spread over a geographical area of 51125 km2 and lies between 77°34’to 81°02’ E longitude and 28°43 to 31°27’ N latitude. It comprises six districts viz., Almora, Bageshwar, Champawat, Nainital, Pithoragarh and Udham Singh Nagar (Figure 1). The study was conducted in the district Nainital. The district is spread over hilly area as well as the plains and divided into 8 Tehsils, 8 development blocks and 1082 villages. The population of the district is 7, 62,909 (2011 sensus) out of which rural population is 4,93,859.
Climate
The study area falls in sub-tropical to temperate climate. The maximum temperature was 40.2o C and minimum temperature was – 5.4o C. The average rainfall in the district was 1407 mm.
River System
There are a number of river and rivulets in the Nainital district. Among them the main rivers flowing through the Nainital are the Gola and Kosi. Many rivulets such as Bhakra, Dabka and Baur also flow in the district.
Figure 1: Location Map of the Study Area. Click here to View figure |
Land Use Patterns
Mostly subsistence and crop based farming is prevailed in the area. Cultivation is done on varying degree of slopes. Wheat, maize and Rice is the principle crop covering about 75% of the total cropland. Cultivated soil grows crops like rice, wheat, corn, mustard, potato, ginger, garlic, onion and varieties of pulses and vegetables. Main fruits are mango, jackfruit, banana, litchi, papaya, citrus, peach, plum, etc. In homegarden area, different types of perennial fruits, timber, fuel wood, fodder and annual vegetable plants prevailed.
Variables of the Study
The dependent variable in this study was the contribution of rural women in vegetable cultivation in homegardens. There were several characteristics of rural women that influence their extent of participation in vegetable cultivation. In the present study, characteristics of rural women selected as independent variables were age, level of education, family size, homegarden size, knowledge about vegetable cultivation etc.
Data Collection
Frequent surveys were conducted in some villages of Nainital district for selection of study sites. After primary survey ten villages involved in homegarden vegetable cultivation were randomly selected and in each village ten households were randomly selected for the collection of data. Thus, through random sampling method 100 rural women were selected for the study. Data for this study were collected through personal interview during May 2014 to April 2015 using questionnaire and field observation. The interviews were conducted with the respondents in their houses. After completion of data collection, responses were analyzed according to the objectives of the study. Statistical measures such as number, percentage, frequency distribution, range, rank order, mean and standard deviation were used in describing the variables of the study. The data was analysed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS version 16) and tables and graphs were used for presenting the data using Excel programme.
For better understanding of comparative participation of rural women on homegarden vegetable cultivation activities a participation index (PI) was computed using the formula 7.
PI= (Pnpx 0)+ (Prap x1)+ (Pop x2)+ (Pfp x3)+(Prp x4)
Where, PI= Participation index
Pnp= Percentage of rural women with no participation
Prap= Percentage of rural women with rare participation
Pop= Percentage of rural women with occasional participation
Pfp= Percentage of rural women with frequent participation
Prp= Percentage of rural women with regular participation
Results and Discussion
Diversity in vegetable Crops
Homegarden is the dwelling place and it is the centre where all the vegetables and quick growing fruits are cultivated.8,9 A variety of vegetable crops are being grown in homegardens of Nainital district (Figure 2). In rural areas of Nainital district, farmers have successfully integrated food crops like potato, leafy vegetables like spinach and fruit vegetables like pumpkin along with fruit and fodder tree in their homegarden area. Some of the cultivated vegetable species are given in Table 1. They have successfully maintained many introduced species in homegardens along with indigenous ones, leading to their integration and acquired cultural significance in the region’s diverse and unique food preparation and eating habits. Most of the rural women interviewed revealed that they are aware of the role of vegetable in household nutrition. The results of the present study indicated that 30% of the total households grow vegetables only for household consumption while 70% grow for both home consumption and commercial purposes. With regard to support from governmental and non-governmental organization on vegetable production, 65% answered that they do not get any support from any organization while 35% responded that they get some services or support. The type of support received included training, planting material/ cutting and technical support.
The sources of seeds/planting materials for home gardens are largely through self maintenance, local market, office of agriculture and rural development, neighbors and relatives. The highest percentage of household (60-75%) uses their own stock. This indicates that local people still have indigenous experiences in preserving genetic diversity of traditionally known vegetables.
Figure 2: Some vegetable crops growing in surveyed homegarden. |
Contribution of Rural Women
The homegarden vegetables form an integral part of the family diet and a part of them enters the commercial market. Although every member of the family has some contribution, the major labour input was contributed by women. The role of women in homegarden vegetable production was found to be prominent in all the surveyed homegardens. Most of the vegetable cultivation activities viz. land preparation, nursery preparation, planting, watering and harvesting, post harvesting handling, processing etc were done by women (Figure 3), while men usually help in ploughing, fertilizer and pesticide application and marketing of homegarden products. Koopman10 and Sanyang et al.,11 also reported that most of the vegetables grown in homegardens are tended almost exclusively by women and remarkably proven to be productive and critically important to nutritional and economic well being of their households.12 Based on the data 80% of the respondents reported that women had the greatest share in growing and managing vegetables in the homegardens. The role of men was only 18% and children contributed only 2%. In a rural area where malnutrition and low sufficiency of vegetables has been challenging owing to several factors, contribution of rural women (who are regarded as invisible in agricultural statistics) is appreciable.\
Figure 3: Rural women involved in different activities of vegetable cultivation in surveyed homegardens. |
It was reported that women play a great role in using and selling homegarden products. 67% of the total respondents from all surveyed homegardens responded that women have the highest share in making decision on the use and sale of the homegarden product while 33% said it was decided by men. This indicated that the product and income obtained from homegarden was mainly utilized for the well being and improvement of the households. Therefore, introducing better homegardening practices can bring changes in the livelihood of rural families in general and female headed households in particular.
Table 1: List of Vegetables Grown by Rural Women in Homegarden.
Vegetable | Local Name | Botanical Name | Family |
Lady’s finger | Bhindi | Abelmoschus esculentus | Malvaceae |
Onion | Piyaz | Allium cepa | Alliaceae |
Garlic | Lahsun | Allium sativum | Alliaceae |
Amaranthus | Chua | Amaranthus cruentus | Amaranthaceae |
Head cabbage | Band gobhi | Brassica oleracea var. capitata | Brassicaceae |
Brassica | Rai | Brassica juncea | Brassicaceae |
Loose cabbage/ Cauli flower | Phool gobhi | Brassica oleracea var. botrytis | Brassicaceae |
Chilly | Mirch | Capsicum annum | Solanaceae |
Chenopodium | Bathua | Chenopodium album | Chenopodiaceae |
Arbi | Gaderi/ Pinalu | Colocasia esculenta | Araceae |
Coriander | Dhania | Coriandrum sativum | Apiaceae |
Pumpkin | Kaddu | Curcurbita pepo | Cucurbitaceae |
Sweet gourd | Ramkerala/ Meetha kerala | Cyclanthra pedata | Cucurbitaceae |
Potato yam | Gethi | Dioscorea bulbifera | Dioscoraceae |
Buckwheat | Ugal | Fagopyrum esculentum | Polygonaceae |
Bottle gourd | Lauki | Lagenaria siceraria | Cucurbitaceae |
Luffa | Torai | Luffa acutangula | Cucurbitaceae |
Tomato | Tamater | Lycopersicon lycopersicum | Solanaceae |
Bitter gourd | Karela | Momordica charantia | Cucurbitaceae |
Bean | Bean | Phaseolus vulgaris | Fabaceae |
Pea | Matar | Pisum sativum | Fabaceae |
Redish | Mulli | Raphanus sativus | Brasicaceae |
Chayote | Ascus | Sechium edule | Cucurbitaceae |
Egg plant | Baigan | Solanum melongena | Solanaceae |
Potato | Aalu | Solanum tuberosum | Solanaceae |
Spinch | Palak | Spinacea oleracea | Amaranthaceae |
Snake gourd | Chichinda | Trichosanthes anguina | Cucurbitaceae |
Fenugreek | Methi | Trigonella foenum-graecum | Fabaceae |
Faba bean | Bakula | Vicia faba | Fabaceae |
Characteristics of Rural Women
Age
Age of rural women play an important role in adoption or rejection of a practice. In the present study the age of the respondents ranged from 19 to 68 years. On the basis of age groups, the respondents were classified into three categories: young age (up to 35 years), middle age (36 to 50 years) and old age (>50 years). Data presented in Table 2 indicates that majority (40-41%) of the rural women were young aged compared to middle aged (37%) and old age category (22 %).
Table 2: Distribution of Rural Women According to their Characteristics.
Characteristic | Category | Percentage | Mean | Standard deviation |
Age | Young age(< 35) | 41.30 | 41.96 | 13.32 |
Middle age(36-50) | 36.96 | |||
Old age(> 50) | 21.74 | |||
Education | Illiterate | 26.09 | 5.75 | 4.30 |
Primary level (I-V) | 26.09 | |||
Higher secondary (VI-XII) | 43.47 | |||
Higher education (under graduate/ Post graduate) | 4.35 | |||
Family size | Small (up to 4 member) | 32.61 | 6.6 | 3.20 |
Medium (5 to 7) | 50.00 | |||
Large (more than 7) | 17.39 | |||
Homegarden size (ha) | Small (<0.002) | 39.13 | 0.011 | 0.0012 |
Medium (0.003-0.006) | 26.17 | |||
Large (>0.01) | 34.78 | |||
Knowledge about homegarden | Poor (upto 10) | 45.65 | – | – |
Good (10-20) | 50.00 | |||
Excellent (above 21) | 4.35 |
Education Level
The range of education level of the respondents ranged from no formal education to higher education levels. The levels of the education were categorized into four groups. These were illiterate (no schooling), primary level (class I-V), secondary level (class VI-X) and higher education level (Undergraduate to post graduate) and presented in Table 2. It revealed that the highest proportion (30-44%) of the respondents had higher secondary level of education while only 4% women had higher education. The average score of educational level of the respondent was 5.75.
Family Size
Family size of the rural women ranged from 2 to 12 members with an average of 6.6 having a standard deviation of 3.20 while in Bhabhar belt it ranged from 2 to 18 members with an average of 7.2 and 4.58 deviation (Table 2). The family size was classified into three categories. These were small (up to 4 members), medium (5-7 members) and large (8 and above members). Data presented in Table1indicated that 47% -50 % of the rural women belonged to medium size family, 30% -33 % belong to small family while 17 %- 22% belong to large family.
Homegarden Size
Homegarden size of the respondents varied from 0.0004 to 0.04 hectares in hills The average homegarden size was 0.011 hectare with a standard deviation of 0.0012. There were three categories of homegarden size viz. small, medium and large (Table 2). Data indicated that majority (39 percent) of the respondent had small homegarden.
Knowledge about Homegarden
The score of knowledge on homestead agroforestry ranged from 8 to 24 against the possible range of 0 to 24 with a mean and standard deviation of 15.49 and 3.59, respectively (Table 2). The respondent were classified into three categories on the basis of their knowledge on homestead agroforestry and poor (up to 10), medium (11-20) and high knowledge (>20). The distribution of the respondents has been presented in Table 2. Data presented in Table 2 show that highest proportion (52 %) of the respondent women had medium knowledge on homestead agroforestry, belong to have high knowledge and compared to 37 % of the rural women. 11% of the respondent had poor knowledge. In our society, women gained knowledge in agricultural activities mostly from her parents before marriage and her husband after marriage. It was observed that knowledge of the housewives was medium which is quite rational because rural women are always related with some sorts of agricultural activities.
Aspect of Rural Women Participation
Extent of participation of rural women in ten major activities of homegarden agroforestry in Kumaun Himalayan region is given in Table 3. Computed participation index against ten activities ranged from 100 to 338. The participation of rural women in the plantation activity had highest participation index (PI= 338) and ranked Ist while participation in marketing of homegarden products had lowest participation index (PI=100) and ranked 10th. All the activities mentioned in the Table 3 are very much associated with women and they perform these activities naturally and thus participation was high.
Table 3: Comparative participation of Rural Women in Ten Major Activities in Homegarden Agroforestry with Participation Indices (PI) and Rank Order (RO).
Activity | Participation of rural women (%) | PI | RO | ||||
Regular | Occasional | Frequent | Rare | Nil | |||
Transplantation | 70 | 9 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 338 | 1 |
Decision making on selection of crop | 65 | 12 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 333 | 2 |
Processing of homegarden products | 68 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 331 | 3 |
Collection of homegarden products | 62 | 12 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 319 | 4 |
Weeding | 57 | 12 | 26 | 2 | 2 | 318 | 5 |
Nursery preparation | 58 | 12 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 306 | 6 |
Land preparation | 60 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 304 | 7 |
Watering | 52 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 3 | 303 | 8 |
Arrangement of seeds/seedlings | 38 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 5 | 256 | 9 |
Marketing of homegarden products | 10 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 60 | 100 | 10 |
Constraints Faced by Rural Women
During cultivation of vegetables rural women face many problems such as lack of capital, lack of irrigation water etc (Table 4). As the rural women has to perform household activities and in hills of Kumaun Himalaya women has to spent time in collection of fodder and fuel wood from the forests, they have scarcity of time for homegarden management. In rural area, poverty is a major problem due to lack of capital. In most of the cases, farmers have no regular source of income; they face difficulty in arrangement of money. There were no proper market and farmers have to sent their homegarden vegetables to nearby market, so they are unable to sell their products in time. Most of the villages in hills are situated far away from roads, lack of transportation facility also become a major constraint. Availability of input supply, seeds, seedlings, pesticides and fertilizer etc was also affected due to distance from market and lack of transportation facility. Lack of irrigation water and dependency on irrigation water (particularly during summer) was a big constraint in vegetable production.
Table 4: Constraints faced by Rural Women in Vegetable Production.
Constraints | Respondents (%) |
Time | 45 |
Distance from market | 52 |
Irrigation facilities | 60 |
Availability of market | 42 |
Availability of Capital | 58 |
Transportation | 32 |
Lack of knowledge | 26 |
Shortage and lack of planting material | 37 |
Other problems | 28 |
Conclusions
Cultivation is an important activity for providing supplementary diets as well as for income generation. Present study recorded that rural women contributed actively in vegetable production in homegarden area. As homegardens were situated nearer to their houses as compared to agricultural field, involvement of rural women in vegetable cultivation was quite common in addition to their daily household activities. Women in farming households that are not earning salaried income can be trapped as potential growers of off-season vegetables. They will not only be converted into income earning members of the households but also as providers of the vegetables required by their households. Providing technology to rural women through training and demonstration can have significant socio-economic impacts and can help in eliminating food insecurity and alleviating poverty in their households. To help them with their genuine problems, irrigation, transportation, credit and marketing facilities should be extended to village level.
Acknowledgements
Financial support from ICSSR (Project F.No.02/66/2014-15/RPR), New Delhi is gratefully acknowledged. We would like to extend our thanks and appreciation to all the rural women who participated in the individual interview and group discussion.
References
- Peyre, A. Guidal, A. Wiersum, K. F. and Bongers, F. Dynamics of homegarden structure and function in Kerala, India. Agrofor. Syst. 66:101-115 (2006).
CrossRef - Bargali, K. Comparative Participation of Rural Women in Agroforestry Home Gardens in Kumaun Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology 6(1): 16-22 (2015).
- Bargali, S. S. Pandey, K. Singh, L. and Srivastava, S. K. Participation of rural women in rice based agroecosystem. Int. Rice .Res. Notes. 33(1): 1-2 (2009).
- Sahani, A. K. Womenfolk in high altitude in Uttarakhand. A Review. Global J. Curr. Res. 2(1): 27-29 (2013).
- Kothari, B. The Invisible Queen in the Plant Kingdom: Gender Perspectives in medical ethanobotany. Pages 150–164 in P. L. Howard, ed., Women and Plants: Gender Relations in Biodiversity Management & Conservation. Zed Books, New York and London (2003).
- Howard, P. L. Gender and Social Dynamics in Swidden and Homegardens in Latin America. Pages 1–24 in B. M. Kumar and P. K. R. Nair, eds., Tropical Homegardens: A Time– 2010] Reyes-García et al.: gendered homegardens in the Iberian Peninsula 245 Tested Example of Sustainable Agroforestry. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (2006a).
- Rokonuzzaman, M. and Islam, M. S. Participation of rural women in goat rearing in a selected area of Bangladesh. J. Bangladesh. Agril. Univ. 7(2):361-366 (2009).
- Bargali, K. Parihaar, R. S. and Bargali, S. S. Traditional agroforestry systems practiced in Kumaun Himalaya, India. In Jain, D. K. Arya, R. C. and Singh, N. P. (eds.):Climate change: Socio economic and environmental issues- Problems and challenges, Mohit Publications, New Delhi. pp- 241-254 (2015).
- Parihaar, R. S. Bargali, K. and Bargali, S.S. Diversity and uses of Ethno-medicinal plants associated with traditional agroforestry systems in Kumaun Himalaya. Indian J Agr. Sci. 84(12):1470-1476 (2014).
- Koopman, J. E. Globalization, gender and poverty in the Senegal River Valley. Fem. Econ. 15(3): 253-285 (2009).
CrossRef - Sanyang, S. E. Kao, T. C. and Huang, W.C. The impact of agricultural technology transfer to women vegetable producers and marketing group in Gambia. World J. Agric. Sci. 5(2): 169-179 (2009).
- Parihaar, R. S. Bargali, K. and Bargali, S.S. Status of an indigenous agroforestry system: a case study in Kumaun Himalaya, India. Indian J Agr. Sci. 85(3):442-447 (2015)