Introduction
Basmati rice is most preferred and therefore fetch a very high premium in both international and domestic markets. From a total area of 7 lakh hectare under basmati rice in country nearly 6 lakh tonnes of milled rice is produced annually. Organic food as is self explanatory needs large quantity of organic manures to supply nutrients in soil but on the contrary, there is a serious decline in organic matter in Indian soils particularly in arid, semi-arid and sub-humid climate. Application of organic manure not only improves the soil organic carbon for sustaining the soil physical quality but also increases the soil N. The replacement of external inputs viz., chemical fertilizers by farm-derived organic inputs normally leads to a reduction in variable input costs under organic management. In Chhattisgarh, by virtue of using less quantity of chemical fertilizers and pesticides and dependency upon naturally available sources of nutrients, producing organic food could have better opportunity towards high remuneration with premium price in market with inherent lesser cost advantage (Singh et al., 2001). Therefore, an experiment has been conducted to evaluate different organic inputs, nutrients sources as well as to compare the chemical and integrated nutrient management in rice
Materials and Methods
Field experiment was carried out during Kharif season of 2010 and 2011 at the Research-cum-Instructional Farm, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur (CG), which had adequate facilities for irrigation and drainage. During the last seven years Rice-Potato-Fallow and rice – onion – fallow cropping system was adopted with recommended package for organic and integrated nutrient management practices. Bulk density (mg-3)1.35, Organic carbon (%) 0.64, pH 7.69, EC (dSm-1 at 25 °C) 0.21 ,Available N, P and K (kg ha-1) content were 226.65, 19.83 and 324.42 kg ha-1 respectively the experiment was conducted in randomized block replicated Thrice With a Plot size of 10 x 10 m in Kharif season The seven Treatments comprise of 50% RDF+ 50% N (CDM), 100% N (1/3rd each CDM+NC+CCR), T2+GM in rice, T2+ DSP, 50% N (CDM) + Azospirillum + RP + PSB, 50% N (CDM) + Azospirillum + RP + PSB and 100% RDF 80: 50: 30 N: P2O5:K2O Kg/ha). The seed was sown by drilling the seeds in lines in raised nurseries. The seed rate was 40 kg ha-1. The transplanting was done with spacing of 20 x 10 cm row to row and plant to plant distance. The recommended dose of fertilizer was 80:50:30 kg NPK ha-1 respectively. The full dose of P and K and 30% of the N was applied at the basal dose and the remaining quantity N was given in 2 splits i.e. 40% at tillering stage and 30 % at PI stage. The P and K were applied through SSP and MOP, Rock Phosphate and biofertilizers namely PSB and Azospirillum .and other organic sources like CDM, Neem cake etc. Nitrogen was given in the form of urea, FYM, crop residues and neem cake. The CDM, crop residues, neem cake and green manure (Sesbania rostrata) and 30 % of N were applied as the basal dose. Two hand weeding was done at 30 and 50 DAT. Water management was given to the crop as per requirement. Water level of 5 ± 2 cm depth was maintained during the crop growth period. crops were harvested with the help of sickles. Soil samples for various soil physico-chemical properties i.e. pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, available nitrogen, available phosphorous and available potassium were analyzed after harvest of crop. Soil pH was determined by digital automatic pH meter in soil water suspension 1:2.5 (Piper, 1967). Electrical conductivity (EC) was determined by taking supernatural liquid of soil water suspension prepared for pH determining by using conductivity meter (Black, 1965). Organic carbon was estimated by Walkley and Black rapid titration method (Piper, 1967). Bulk density was determine by removing natural undisturbed core sample from soil up to 21cm depth with 7 cm intervals by core sampler the samples where oven dried 105 oC to a constant weight bulk density was calculated by following formula:
Available nitrogen of the soil was determined by alkaline permanganate method of Subbiah and Asija (1956). Available phosphorous of the soil was estimated by Olsen’s method (Olsen’s et al., 1954). Available potassium was determined by flame photometer after 5 minutes shaking with 25 ml of 1 N ammonium acetate (Hanway and Heiddle, 1952). Whereas Water uptake is calculated by the following formula: (Hong and Song, 1998)
Water uptake (ml) = 100/2gm x Actual water absorbed.
Results and Discussion
N Uptake in Grain and Straw
The data regarding nitrogen uptake in grain, straw and total are presented in Table (1) Plots treated with (100% RDF) resulted significantly higher uptake of N in grain and straw which was at par with T1 (50%RDF + 50%N applied through CDM), over rest of the treatments. Poor most N-uptake in grain was recorded under (50%N applied through CDM + Azos + RP + PSB). As far, the total uptake of N, significantly higher total N uptake was recorded under T7. On an average the 100% inorganic treatments showed higher N uptake in grain and straw and total followed by the INM treatment where as the treatment under 50% organic manure given the lowest N uptake in grain and straw. These results were in agreement with the findings of Hatwar et al (1992).
Table 1: Grain N uptake, Kg ha-1, straw N uptake, Kg ha-1, Total N uptake, Kg ha-1, Water uptake in grain (ml) of rice as influenced by different nutrient management (pooled 2 years).
Treatments |
Grain |
straw |
Total N uptake Kg ha-1 |
Water uptake in grain (ml) |
|
N uptakeKg ha-1 |
N uptake Kg ha-1 |
||||
T1 | 50% RDF +50% N (CDM) |
32.02 |
17.13 |
49.15 |
261.33 |
T2 | 100% N (1/3rd each CDM+NC+CCR) |
29.46 |
13.09 |
42.55 |
265.00 |
T3 | T2+GM in rice |
30.11 |
14.89 |
45.00 |
271.67 |
T4 | T2 +DSP |
28.77 |
12.85 |
41.59 |
266.33 |
T5 | 50% N (CDM) + Azospirillum+ RP+PSB |
28.36 |
12.82 |
41.21 |
253.67 |
T6 | T2 + Azospirillum+PSB |
30.23 |
14.75 |
44.98 |
266.00 |
T7 | 100% RDF |
34.43 |
19.46 |
53.89 |
259.67 |
Sem+ |
1.33 |
0.94 |
1.14 |
4.08 |
|
CD(P=.05) |
4.04 |
2.87 |
3.80 |
12.40 |
|
Overall Mean |
30.48 |
15.00 |
45.48 |
263.38 |
|
Comparison |
|||||
100% inorganic fertilizers (T7) |
34.43 |
19.46 |
53.89 |
259.67 |
|
Integrated nutrient management (T1) |
32.02 |
17.13 |
49.15 |
261.33 |
|
100% organic fertilizer-mean of (T2+T3+T4+T6) |
29.64 |
13.89 |
43.53 |
267.25 |
|
50% organic fertilizer (T5 ) + Azos + RP + PSB |
28.36 |
12..82 |
41.21 |
253.67 |
Water Uptake in Grain (ml)
Water uptake by rice have been evaluated and data are presented in table (1) Treatment T3 (100% N applied through 1/3 each CDM + NC + CCR) + GM in rice recorded the highest water uptake followed by T4 (100% N (1/3 each CDM + NC + CCR) whereas the treatments T5 (50% N(CDM) + Azos + RP + PSB) gives the lowest value for water uptakes in grain. On comparison of inorganic , organic and integrated nutrients Practices, highest water required for its uptake by rice under organically produced crop (Sarawgi et al, 2006).
Available N, P and K Status of Soil (Kg ha–1)
Available N, P and K status of soil after harvesting of rice are shown in Table (2) Application of 100% RDF helped to accumulate higher N, P and K in soil over rest of the treatment. In different treatments available N ranged from 221-260 kg ha-1, available phosphorous ranged from 17.60 to 23.40 kg ha-1 and available K ranged from 243 to 284 kg ha-1 (Urkurkar et al, 2010).
Table 2: Available Nitrogen, phosphorus and potash in soil as influenced by different nutrient management after harvest (pooled 2 years).
Treatments |
Available N Kg ha-1 |
Available P Kg ha-1 |
Available K Kg ha-1 |
||
T1 | 50% RDF+50% N (CDM) |
244.00 |
19.70 |
261.00 |
|
T2 | 100% N (1/3rd each CDM+NC+CCR) |
230.00 |
18.10 |
252.00 |
|
T3 | T2+GM in rice |
246.00 |
20.60 |
254.00 |
|
T4 | T2+DSP |
226.00 |
18.70 |
250.00 |
|
T5 | 50% N (CDM) + Azospirillum + RP + PSB |
221.00 |
17.60 |
243.00 |
|
T6 | T2 + Azospirillum+PSB |
232.00 |
20.40 |
252.00 |
|
T7 | 100% RDF |
260.00 |
23.40 |
284.00 |
|
Sem+ |
4.00 |
0.77 |
6.00 |
||
CD(P=.05) |
13.00 |
2.35 |
18.00 |
||
Overall Mean |
237.00 |
19.78 |
260.00 |
||
Comparison |
|||||
100% inorganic fertilizers |
260.00 |
23.40 |
284.00 |
||
50% organic manure + 50% inorganic fertilizers (INM) |
244.00 |
19.70 |
261.00 |
||
100% organic fertilizer-mean of (T2+T3+T4+T6) |
233.50 |
19.45 |
252.00 |
||
50% organic manures (T5 ) + Azos+ RP + PSB |
221.00 |
17.60 |
243.00 |
Physico Chemical Properties of Soil
Bulk density was higher in 100% RDF (T7) as compared to other treatments. Here significantly lower bulk density was recorded under T6 (T2 + Azos + PSB) which was at par with rest of the treatments Table (3). Whereas the value of pH ranged from 7.47 to 7.32 between different organic, inorganic and integrated nutrient management treatments however significantly higher pH value was recorded under treatment T7 (100% RDF) and other treatments viz. T1, T2 recorded at par and T4 and T5 recorded the lowest pH value. While the reading of electrical conductivity ranged between 0.22 to 0.30 where T7 (100% RDF) significantly resulted in higher value of EC over rest of the treatments T2 (100% N 1/3 CDM + NC + CCR) recorded the lowest value of electrical conductivity. Lastly the organic carbon percentage which ranges from 0.50 to 0.54 where the maximum organic carbon was significantly recorded under treatment T6 (100% N CDM + NC + CCR + Azos + PSB) which was at par with T2, T3, T1, T4 whereas the least organic carbon percentage was recorded under T5. (50% N CDM + Azos + RP + PSB). These results was in collaboration with the findings of Bellakki and Badanur (1997).
Table 3: Soil physico chemical properties (BD, pH, EC, OC %) as influenced by different nutrient management after harvest (Pooled 2 years).
Treatment |
BD mg m-3 |
pH |
EC dsm-1 |
OC% |
||
T1 | 50% RDF +50% N (CDM) |
1.37 |
7.46 |
0.25 |
0.52 |
|
T2 | 100% N (1/3rd each CDM + NC + CCR) |
1.32 |
7.38 |
0.22 |
0.53 |
|
T3 | T2+GM in rice |
1.29 |
7.37 |
0.23 |
0.53 |
|
T4 | T2 +DSP |
1.33 |
7.35 |
0.26 |
0.52 |
|
T5 | 50% N (CDM) + Azospirillum + RP +PSB |
1.35 |
7.35 |
0.25 |
0.51 |
|
T6 | T2 + Azospirillum+PSB |
1.28 |
7.32 |
0.24 |
0.54 |
|
T7 | 100% RDF |
1.41 |
7.47 |
0.30 |
0.50 |
|
SEm± |
0.009 |
0.03 |
0.008 |
0.01 |
||
C.D. (P=0.05%) |
0.026 |
0.09 |
0.026 |
0.03 |
||
Overall Mean |
1.33 |
7.37 |
0.25 |
0.52 |
||
Comparison |
||||||
100% inorganic fertilizers |
1.41 |
7.47 |
0.30 |
0.50 |
||
50% organic manure + 50% inorganic fertilizers (INM) |
1.37 |
7.46 |
0.25 |
0.52 |
||
100% organic fertilizer-mean of (T2+T3+T4+T6) |
1.30 |
7.35 |
0.23 |
0.53 |
||
50% organic manures (T5 ) + Azos + RP + PSB |
1.35 |
7.35 |
0.25 |
0.51 |
Acknowledgements
I am very thankful to all professors of Department Agronomy for their support to complete this work successfully.
Reference
- Bellakki, M.A. and Badnaur, V.P. 1997. Long term effect of integrated nutrient management on properties of vertisol under dryland agriculture.Journal Indian society of Soil Science. 45(3): 438 – 442.
- Black, C.A. 1965. Method of soil analysis. Agron. Inc. Madison, Wisconson, SA. pp.131-137.
- Hansway, J.J. and Hiddle, H. 1952. Bulletin low state college of Agriculture.57:1
- Hatwar, K.G., Rahate, V.T., Thakare, J.T. 1992. Nitrogen uptake behaviour ofsummer rice as influenced by sowing dates spacing and nitrogen levels.Annals of plant physiology6 (2):252-257.
- Hong, M.C. and Song, S. 1998. Studies on the quality of embryoed rice and effect of grain character harvesting date and moisture content on the quality of embryoed rice Special Publication Taichung district Agric. Improvement Stat 13:249 -218.
- Olsen, S.R. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extracting with sodium bio-carbonate USDA Circ. No. 939: 1-19
- Piper, C.S. 1967. Soil and Plant analysis. Asia pub. House,Bombay,New Delhi,pp.30
- Sarawgi, S.K., Purohit, K.K., Sarawgi, A.K., and Singh, A.P. 2006. Effect of Nutrient management on semi dwarf, medium to long slender scented rice varieties in alfisols of Chhattisgarh. Journal of Agricultural Issues 11(1): 75- 78.
- Singh, S.P., Shobha Rani, N., Krishnavenil, B. and Subhaiah, S.V. 2001.
- Effect of nitrogen levels and irrigation schedules on grain yield and quality of scented ricevarieties. Oryza 38(1-2): 86-87.
- Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid method for the estimation of nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci. 26:259-260.
- Urkurkar, J.S., Tiwari, A, Chitale,S. and Bajpai, R.K. 2010. Influence of long term use of inorganic and organic manures on soil fertility and sustainable productivity of rice(Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) in inceptisols. Indian Journal of Agricultural sciences 80 (3): 208-211.